On 21.07.20 17:32, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 5:30 PM Dafna Hirschfeld
<dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 21.07.20 14:36, Tomasz Figa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 2:26 PM Dafna Hirschfeld
<dafna.hirschfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 20.07.20 21:25, Helen Koike wrote:
On 7/18/20 11:59 AM, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote:
The code in rkisp1-isp.c requires access to struct 'rkisp1_device'
in several places. It access it using the 'container_of' macro.
This patch adds a pointer to 'rkisp1_device' in struct 'rkisp1_isp'
to simplify the access.
What is wrong with container_of?
I remember Laurent suggested it a while ago.
I also feel container_of is a bit cumbersome and other entities already have a pointer to rkisp1_device.
Do we even need the rkisp1_isp struct? Could we just pass rkisp1_device instead?
pass to where ? You mean to the function rkisp1_mipi_csi2_start ?
Yes, all around the driver, where rkisp1_isp is passed.
Most of the functions are part of subdevice callback implementation
where the rkisp1_device is not needed, so I don't the see the point.
Thanks,
Dafna