> Hi, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-media-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-media- >> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pawel Osciak >> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:04 AM >> To: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: p.osciak@xxxxxxxxxxx; m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; >> kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [PATCH v2] v4l: videobuf: code cleanup. >> >> Make videobuf pass checkpatch; minor code cleanups. > > I thought this kind patches were frowned upon.. > > http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/development-process/4.Coding#41 > > But maybe it's acceptable in this case... I'm not an expert on community > policies :) It is true that you shouldn't do this 'just to clean up code'. But in this case we want to do a lot of work on the videobuf framework, and it helps a lot if it is first brought up to date with the coding standards. It's just step one in a much longer process :-) Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
