Hi Andy,
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 03:46:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 06:54:12PM +0800, Dongchun Zhu wrote:
> > Add a V4L2 sub-device driver for DW9768 voice coil motor, providing
> > control to set the desired focus via IIC serial interface.
>
> ...
>
> > +config VIDEO_DW9768
> > + tristate "DW9768 lens voice coil support"
> > + depends on I2C && VIDEO_V4L2
>
> No compile test?
>
> > + depends on PM
>
> This is very strange dependency for ordinary driver.
>
> > + select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> > + select VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API
> > + select V4L2_FWNODE
>
> ...
>
> > +/*
> > + * DW9768 requires waiting time (delay time) of t_OPR after power-up,
> > + * or in the case of PD reset taking place.
> > + */
> > +#define DW9768_T_OPR_US 1000
> > +#define DW9768_Tvib_MS_BASE10 (64 - 1)
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_MODE_DEFAULT 2
>
> > +#define DW9768_AAC_TIME_DEFAULT 0x20
>
> Hex? Why not decimal?
>
> > +#define DW9768_CLOCK_PRE_SCALE_DEFAULT 1
>
> ...
>
> > +static int dw9768_mod_reg(struct dw9768 *dw9768, u8 reg, u8 mask, u8 val)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(client, reg);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
>
> > + val = ((unsigned char)ret & ~mask) | (val & mask);
>
> This cast is weird.
>
> > +
> > + return i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client, reg, val);
> > +}
>
> ...
>
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s I2C failure: %d",
> > + __func__, ret);
>
> One line?
>
> ...
>
> > +static int dw9768_release(struct dw9768 *dw9768)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&dw9768->sd);
> > + u32 move_delay_us = dw9768_cal_move_delay(dw9768->aac_mode,
> > + dw9768->clock_presc,
> > + dw9768->aac_timing) / 100;
> > + int ret, val;
> > +
> > + val = round_down(dw9768->focus->val, DW9768_MOVE_STEPS);
> > + for ( ; val >= 0; val -= DW9768_MOVE_STEPS) {
> > + ret = dw9768_set_dac(dw9768, val);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "I2C write fail: %d", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + usleep_range(move_delay_us, move_delay_us + 1000);
> > + }
>
>
> It will look more naturally in the multiplier kind of value.
>
> unsigned int steps = DIV_ROUND_UP(...);
>
> while (steps--) {
> ...(..., steps * ..._MOVE_STEPS);
> ...
> }
>
> but double check arithmetics.
>
First of all, thank for the review!
As for this particular change suggestion, I suspect this could be a
subjective thing, because for me the current code looks more naturally
and it's what the other VCM drivers do.
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
>
> Also it seems we need to have writex_poll_timeout() implementation (see
> iopoll.h).
What would it be supposed to do? readx_poll_timeout() repeats reading
the same registers and sleeping until a condition becomes true, which is
basically "polling". In this case we're not polling anything and we're
not writing the same value, but it's an explicit algorithm of this
driver to power down the VCM corectly.
However, given that it's quite common among VCMs to require this kind of
phased power down - we could indeed provide some V4L2 VCM helpers for open
and release.
Best regards,
Tomasz
