On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:26:04PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 05/05/2020 16:15, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Tue, 5 May 2020 14:24:22 +0200
> > Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> >
> >> On 05/05/2020 14:17, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Em Tue, 5 May 2020 10:33:00 +0200
> >>> Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> >>>
> >>>> The following changes since commit e51759f56d314d28c25be7606b03791f048e44c7:
> >>>>
> >>>> media: v4l2-ctrls.h: clarify the p_def argument of v4l2_ctrl_new_std_compound (2020-04-29 12:04:58 +0200)
> >>>>
> >>>> are available in the Git repository at:
> >>>>
> >>>> git://linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git tags/br-tegra
> >>>>
> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 0bba0154ded02babccd59e21c6a27c5ad7d50faf:
> >>>>
> >>>> MAINTAINERS: Add Tegra Video driver section (2020-05-05 10:26:05 +0200)
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> Tag branch
> >>>>
> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> Sowjanya Komatineni (2):
> >>>> media: tegra: Add Tegra210 Video input driver
> >>>> MAINTAINERS: Add Tegra Video driver section
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As pointed by checkpatch:
> >>>
> >>> WARNING: DT compatible string "nvidia,tegra210-csi" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >>> #628: FILE: drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c:521:
> >>> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-csi", .data = &tegra210_csi_soc },
> >>>
> >>> WARNING: DT compatible string "nvidia,tegra210-csi" appears un-documented -- check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> >>> #3238: FILE: drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/video.c:106:
> >>> + { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-csi", },
> >>>
> >>> and double-checked with:
> >>>
> >>> $ git grep "nvidia,tegra210-csi"
> >>> drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/csi.c: { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-csi", .data = &tegra210_csi_soc },
> >>> drivers/staging/media/tegra-video/video.c: { .compatible = "nvidia,tegra210-csi", },
> >>>
> >>> The DT specs for this driver are missing. I even checked at linux-next:
> >>> there's no DT bindings for this.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I should have mentioned this in the cover letter: the binding file
> >> is here: https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/63576/
> >>
> >> But it will be merged via the tegra subsystem (Thierry Reding) since it is
> >> part of the display bindings, not media bindings. Also, Thierry was planning
> >> to convert it to yaml, so he offered to merge it instead.
> >
> > Ok. Please re-send the pull request (or just mark it as New on patchwork)
> > once the bindings arrive linux-next.
>
> It's still marked as New in patchwork :-) (https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/63596/)
>
> >
> > Alternatively, I don't mind if those patches would also be merged via
> > Tegra's tree, together with the bindings. On such case, feel free to
> > add, for both patches:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mauro, do you mind if I turn that into an Acked-by? I think the ARM SoC
maintainers may prefer that as being more of an explicit statement than
Reviewed-by: that it's fine to take this through ARM SoC.
>
> Thierry, let us know what you want to do. It might not be a bad idea to merge
> the whole series through your tree, as Mauro suggested. It keeps everything
> together.
I can do that. For ARM SoC I typically create a for-X.Y/dt-bindings
branch where I collect device tree bindings patches that don't have
a better place anywhere else, so I'll probably stick the DT binding
update into that branch and then I can base a for-5.8/media branch
on top of that to resolve the checkpatch warnings.
Actually, once I have that I could even just send a PR to Mauro to
take this through the media tree since the dependencies should all
be resolved. But with an Acked-by I'm sure the ARM SoC maintainers
won't mind picking this up.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
