Re: [PATCH] Minimal libv4l2 support for complex cameras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Pavel,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 01:22:17PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:47:27PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> 
> >> We now have easy-to-install support for complex camera in form of
> >> Maemo Leste on N900.... Unfortunately we don't have anything in
> >> userspace that can be used to work with the camera.
> >> 
> >> This attempts to be minimal solution to get libv4l2 to work.
> > 
> > libv4l2 is mostly deprecated. How about contributing an OMAP3 ISP
> > pipeline handler to libcamera instead ? :-)
> 
> Why should it be instead?
> 
> I need something for kernel testing, and there is ton of apps using
> it. Let me do this. libcamera might be future, but...

Sure, if it's useful for you, I won't prevent you from developing any
code you want :-) But there's very little chance of getting it merged,
and it would be useful to more people to have a support for that
platform in libcamera. It's really your decision, and I'm not blaming
you.

> >> It enables passing camera pipeline description to libv4l2, so that
> >> controls are mapped to appopriate devices, and libv4l2 can be used
> >> with complex camera.
> >> 
> >> It is useful for testing kernel parts of N900 subsystem, and it will
> >> serve as a basis for autofocus work and autogain improvements.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux