Hi Andrey,
Thank you for the review.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 3:13 PM Andrey Konovalov
<andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Lad,
>
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> On 28.02.2020 19:55, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> > imx219 sensor is capable for RAW8/RAW10 modes, this commit adds support
> > for SRGGB8_1X8 format.
>
> ... but not for SGRBG8_1X8, SGBRG8_1X8, and SBGGR8_1X8?
>
Yes, will update the commit message.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> > index 8b48e148f2d0..1388c9bc00bb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c
> > @@ -90,6 +90,9 @@
> >
> > #define IMX219_REG_ORIENTATION 0x0172
> >
> > +#define IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7 0x018c
> > +#define IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15 0x018d
> > +
> > /* Test Pattern Control */
> > #define IMX219_REG_TEST_PATTERN 0x0600
> > #define IMX219_TEST_PATTERN_DISABLE 0
> > @@ -135,6 +138,16 @@ struct imx219_mode {
> > struct imx219_reg_list reg_list;
> > };
> >
> > +struct imx219_pixfmt {
> > + u32 code;
> > + u32 colorspace;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct imx219_pixfmt imx219_formats[] = {
> > + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB, },
> > + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB },
> > +};
>
> This table has only one (RGGB) layout (out of 4 possible) for 8-bit and for 10-bit
> modes.
>
> > +
> > /*
> > * Register sets lifted off the i2C interface from the Raspberry Pi firmware
> > * driver.
> > @@ -168,8 +181,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_3280x2464_regs[] = {
> > {0x0171, 0x01},
> > {0x0174, 0x00},
> > {0x0175, 0x00},
> > - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> > - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> > {0x0301, 0x05},
> > {0x0303, 0x01},
> > {0x0304, 0x03},
> > @@ -230,8 +241,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_1920_1080_regs[] = {
> > {0x0171, 0x01},
> > {0x0174, 0x00},
> > {0x0175, 0x00},
> > - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> > - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> > {0x0301, 0x05},
> > {0x0303, 0x01},
> > {0x0304, 0x03},
> > @@ -290,8 +299,6 @@ static const struct imx219_reg mode_1640_1232_regs[] = {
> > {0x0171, 0x01},
> > {0x0174, 0x01},
> > {0x0175, 0x01},
> > - {0x018c, 0x0a},
> > - {0x018d, 0x0a},
> > {0x0301, 0x05},
> > {0x0303, 0x01},
> > {0x0304, 0x03},
> > @@ -413,6 +420,8 @@ struct imx219 {
> > struct v4l2_subdev sd;
> > struct media_pad pad;
> >
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt fmt;
> > +
>
> - adding the whole struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt for "is it RAW10 or RAW8" looks
> like an overkill (and adds some duplication of code - see below).
>
> > struct clk *xclk; /* system clock to IMX219 */
> > u32 xclk_freq;
> >
> > @@ -519,19 +528,26 @@ static int imx219_write_regs(struct imx219 *imx219,
> > }
> >
> > /* Get bayer order based on flip setting. */
> > -static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219)
> > +static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, u32 code)
>
> Naming the 2nd argument as 'code' seems a bit confusing to me, as it
> used to select between MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*_1X10 and MEDIA_BUS_FMT_*_1X8.
> While the Bayer order depends on the current hflip/vflip settings
> (they are stored in struct imx219).
>
Agreed, I shall replace it with something better.
> > {
> > - /*
> > - * Only one bayer order is supported.
> > - * It depends on the flip settings.
> > - */
> > - static const u32 codes[2][2] = {
> > + static const u32 codes10[2][2] = {
> > { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10, },
> > { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10, },
> > };
> > + static const u32 codes8[2][2] = {
> > + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8, },
> > + { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8, },
> > + };
> >
> > lockdep_assert_held(&imx219->mutex);
> > - return codes[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> > +
> > + if (code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10 ||
> > + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10 ||
> > + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10 ||
> > + code == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10)
> > + return codes10[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> > +
> > + return codes8[imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> > }
>
> Wouldn't extending the original table be a better and simpler solution?
> Something like:
>
> static u32 imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, int is_8_bit)
> {
> static const u32 codes[2][2][2] = {
> {
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10, },
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10, },
> },
> {
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8, },
> { MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8, MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8, },
> },
> };
>
> lockdep_assert_held(&imx219->mutex);
> return codes[is_8bit][imx219->vflip->val][imx219->hflip->val];
> }
>
> "is_8bit" a member of struct imx219 which equals to 0 if the sensor if RAW10 mode,
> and is 1 for RAW8 mode.
>
Agreed.
> >
> > static int imx219_open(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh)
> > @@ -539,13 +555,26 @@ static int imx219_open(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh)
> > struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> > struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *try_fmt =
> > v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, fh->pad, 0);
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *fmt;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
> >
> > + fmt = &imx219->fmt;
> > + fmt->code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8;
> > + fmt->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
> > + fmt->ycbcr_enc = V4L2_MAP_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT(fmt->colorspace);
> > + fmt->quantization = V4L2_MAP_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT(true,
> > + fmt->colorspace,
> > + fmt->ycbcr_enc);
> > + fmt->xfer_func = V4L2_MAP_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT(fmt->colorspace);
> > + fmt->width = supported_modes[0].width;
> > + fmt->height = supported_modes[0].height;
> > + fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > +
> > /* Initialize try_fmt */
> > try_fmt->width = supported_modes[0].width;
> > try_fmt->height = supported_modes[0].height;
> > - try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> > + try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, fmt->code);
> > try_fmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&imx219->mutex);
> > @@ -646,16 +675,12 @@ static int imx219_enum_mbus_code(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > struct v4l2_subdev_mbus_code_enum *code)
> > {
> > - struct imx219 *imx219 = to_imx219(sd);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Only one bayer order is supported (though it depends on the flip
> > - * settings)
> > - */
>
> Guess the above comment still holds
>
> > - if (code->index > 0)
>
> Though two media bus formats will be available: 8-bit and 10-bit ones, both
> with the same Bayer order.
>
> > + if (code->pad != 0)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + if (code->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> > + code->code = imx219_formats[code->index].code;
>
> This excludes all the Bayer orders except RGGB thus breaking the hflip/vflip support, right?
>
> I would better check (as the sensor can only support two media bus formats at a time):
> if (code->index > 1)
> return -EINVAL;
> and use imx219_get_format_code(struct imx219 *imx219, int is_8_bit) to set the code->code:
> code->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, code->index);
>
Yes agreed.
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -669,7 +694,7 @@ static int imx219_enum_frame_size(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > if (fse->index >= ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - if (fse->code != imx219_get_format_code(imx219))
> > + if (fse->code != imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219->fmt.code))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > fse->min_width = supported_modes[fse->index].width;
>
> Looking at the "[PATCH 3/3] media: i2c: imx219: Add support 640x480",
> the RAW8 mode is added to the end of the supported_modes[] array after the three RAW10 modes.
> Guess this breaks VIDIOC_SUBDEV_ENUM_FRAME_SIZE ioctl for RAW8, as in the RAW8 case
> it would return 0 (and the supported frame sizes) for fse->index=3 only, while for all
> the other values, fse->index=0 included, it will return -EINVAL ...
>
Not really 640x480 can be either 8/10 bit.
> > @@ -696,7 +721,7 @@ static void imx219_update_pad_format(struct imx219 *imx219,
> > {
> > fmt->format.width = mode->width;
> > fmt->format.height = mode->height;
> > - fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> > + fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, imx219->fmt.code);
> > fmt->format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> >
> > imx219_reset_colorspace(&fmt->format);
> > @@ -710,7 +735,7 @@ static int __imx219_get_pad_format(struct imx219 *imx219,
> > struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *try_fmt =
> > v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(&imx219->sd, cfg, fmt->pad);
> > /* update the code which could change due to vflip or hflip: */
> > - try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> > + try_fmt->code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219, try_fmt->code);
> > fmt->format = *try_fmt;
> > } else {
> > imx219_update_pad_format(imx219, imx219->mode, fmt);
> > @@ -741,11 +766,19 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > const struct imx219_mode *mode;
> > struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *framefmt;
> > int exposure_max, exposure_def, hblank;
> > + int i;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&imx219->mutex);
> >
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats); i++)
> > + if (imx219_formats[i].code == fmt->format.code)
>
> This excludes all the Bayer orders except RGGB thus breaking the hflip/vflip support, right?
>
Yes my bad.
> > + break;
> > + if (i >= ARRAY_SIZE(imx219_formats))
> > + i = 0;
> > +
> > /* Bayer order varies with flips */
> > - fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219);
> > + fmt->format.code = imx219_get_format_code(imx219,
> > + imx219_formats[i].code);
> >
> > mode = v4l2_find_nearest_size(supported_modes,
> > ARRAY_SIZE(supported_modes),
> > @@ -756,6 +789,7 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > framefmt = v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(sd, cfg, fmt->pad);
> > *framefmt = fmt->format;
> > } else if (imx219->mode != mode) {
> > + imx219->fmt = fmt->format;
> > imx219->mode = mode;
> > /* Update limits and set FPS to default */
> > __v4l2_ctrl_modify_range(imx219->vblank, IMX219_VBLANK_MIN,
> > @@ -786,6 +820,36 @@ static int imx219_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int imx219_set_framefmt(struct imx219 *imx219)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + switch (imx219->fmt.code) {
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB8_1X8:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG8_1X8:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG8_1X8:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR8_1X8:
> > + ret = imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7,
> > + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x08);
> > + ret |= imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15,
> > + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x08);
> > + break;
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SRGGB10_1X10:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGRBG10_1X10:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SGBRG10_1X10:
> > + case MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10:
> > + ret = imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_0_7,
> > + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x0a);
> > + ret |= imx219_write_reg(imx219, IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A_8_15,
> > + IMX219_REG_VALUE_08BIT, 0x0a);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int imx219_start_streaming(struct imx219 *imx219)
> > {
> > struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&imx219->sd);
> > @@ -800,6 +864,12 @@ static int imx219_start_streaming(struct imx219 *imx219)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + ret = imx219_set_framefmt(imx219);
>
> I just wonder if it makes sense to remove setting IMX219_CSI_DATA_FORMAT_A register
> from the struct imx219_reg mode_x_y_regs[] tables and to introduce new imx219_set_framefmt()
> function which is called right after the settings from the mode_x_y_regs[] are written
> into the sensor, and is never called otherwise?
>
These register settings depend upon the format being set either
8/10bit, as a result a imx219_set_framefmt()
is introduced to set it accordingly just before starting the streaming.
Cheers,
--Prabhakar
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "%s failed to set format\n", __func__);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Apply customized values from user */
> > ret = __v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(imx219->sd.ctrl_handler);
> > if (ret)
> >
