Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2010 13:15:12 Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Add support for event handling to do_ioctl.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ...
>>> @@ -239,6 +241,13 @@ struct v4l2_ioctl_ops {
>>> int (*vidioc_enum_frameintervals) (struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> struct v4l2_frmivalenum *fival);
>>>
>>> + int (*vidioc_dqevent) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
>>> + struct v4l2_event *ev);
>>> + int (*vidioc_subscribe_event) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
>>> + struct v4l2_event_subscription *sub);
>>> + int (*vidioc_unsubscribe_event) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
>>> + struct v4l2_event_subscription *sub);
>>> +
>>> /* For other private ioctls */
>>> long (*vidioc_default) (struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> int cmd, void *arg);
>>
>> Replying to myself, there seems to be valid use for the struct file as
>> an argument to the function fields. That is a way to get the video
>> device pointer using video_devdata(). Otherwise the video device pointer
>> has to be stored in the file handle instead.
>>
>> So I'm going to add the file pointers as first arguments here as they
>> are in other functions unless there are objections. The type of second
>> argument is still going to be struct v4l2_fh *.
>
> No, instead v4l2_fh should have a pointer to video_device. Much cleaner and
> consistent with the other v4l2 internal structures.
Right. Fixed that. There's now struct video_device pointer in struct
v4l2_fh.
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
