On Sunday 07 February 2010 13:15:12 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Add support for event handling to do_ioctl.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> > @@ -239,6 +241,13 @@ struct v4l2_ioctl_ops {
> > int (*vidioc_enum_frameintervals) (struct file *file, void *fh,
> > struct v4l2_frmivalenum *fival);
> >
> > + int (*vidioc_dqevent) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_event *ev);
> > + int (*vidioc_subscribe_event) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_event_subscription *sub);
> > + int (*vidioc_unsubscribe_event) (struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_event_subscription *sub);
> > +
> > /* For other private ioctls */
> > long (*vidioc_default) (struct file *file, void *fh,
> > int cmd, void *arg);
>
> Replying to myself, there seems to be valid use for the struct file as
> an argument to the function fields. That is a way to get the video
> device pointer using video_devdata(). Otherwise the video device pointer
> has to be stored in the file handle instead.
>
> So I'm going to add the file pointers as first arguments here as they
> are in other functions unless there are objections. The type of second
> argument is still going to be struct v4l2_fh *.
No, instead v4l2_fh should have a pointer to video_device. Much cleaner and
consistent with the other v4l2 internal structures.
And see also my review I'm posting soon.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Regards,
>
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
