Am 03.02.2010 21:52, schrieb Devin Heitmueller: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> signed-off-by: Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@xxxxxxxx> >> >> --- a/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-cards.c >> +++ b/drivers/staging/tm6000/tm6000-cards.c >> @@ -221,12 +239,13 @@ struct usb_device_id tm6000_id_table [] = { >> { USB_DEVICE(0x2040, 0x6600), .driver_info = >> TM6010_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_900H }, >> { USB_DEVICE(0x6000, 0xdec0), .driver_info = >> TM6010_BOARD_BEHOLD_WANDER }, >> { USB_DEVICE(0x6000, 0xdec1), .driver_info = >> TM6010_BOARD_BEHOLD_VOYAGER }, >> { USB_DEVICE(0x0ccd, 0x0086), .driver_info = >> TM6010_BOARD_TERRATEC_CINERGY_HYBRID_XE }, >> { }, >> }; >> >> /* Tuner callback to provide the proper gpio changes needed for xc2028 */ >> >> -static int tm6000_tuner_callback(void *ptr, int component, int command, >> int arg) >> +int tm6000_tuner_callback(void *ptr, int component, int command, int arg) >> { >> > Why was the static removed from this declaration? What could possibly > be calling this from outside the module? And if there were something > that needed it, the declaration would have to be moved to a header > file so it could be included elsewhere (which should be in this same > patch). > > Just to be clear, the fact that I am going through these patches > should not be taken personally - I'm just trying to give you some > advice on what you need to do to ensure the patches can be accepted > upstream and be reviewed with minimal cost to the other developers. > > Devin > > 1. It broke by building. 2. callback for dvb frontend (tm6000-dvb.c) so can the tuner a reset send if it goes in DVB mode (it must reload the firmware) -- Stefan Ringel <stefan.ringel@xxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html