Clang-9 makes some different inlining decisions compared to gcc, which
leads to a warning about a possible stack overflow problem when building
with CONFIG_KASAN, including when setting asan-stack=0, which avoids
most other frame overflow warnings:
drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c:673:12: error: stack frame size of 2224 bytes in function 'encode_plane'
Manually adding noinline_for_stack annotations in those functions
called by encode_plane() or decode_plane() that require a significant
amount of kernel stack makes this impossible to happen with any
compiler.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
v2: annotate fwht() as well, add a comment
---
drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c | 29 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c b/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
index d1d6085da9f1..a9ae11783c90 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/vicodec/codec-fwht.c
@@ -46,8 +46,12 @@ static const uint8_t zigzag[64] = {
63,
};
-
-static int rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
+/*
+ * noinline_for_stack to work around
+ * https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38809
+ */
+static int noinline_for_stack
+rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
{
s16 block[8 * 8];
s16 *wp = block;
@@ -106,8 +110,8 @@ static int rlc(const s16 *in, __be16 *output, int blocktype)
* This function will worst-case increase rlc_in by 65*2 bytes:
* one s16 value for the header and 8 * 8 coefficients of type s16.
*/
-static u16 derlc(const __be16 **rlc_in, s16 *dwht_out,
- const __be16 *end_of_input)
+static noinline_for_stack u16
+derlc(const __be16 **rlc_in, s16 *dwht_out, const __be16 *end_of_input)
{
/* header */
const __be16 *input = *rlc_in;
@@ -240,8 +244,9 @@ static void dequantize_inter(s16 *coeff)
*coeff <<= *quant;
}
-static void fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
- unsigned int input_step, bool intra)
+static void noinline_for_stack
+fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
+ unsigned int input_step, bool intra)
{
/* we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients */
s32 workspace1[8], workspace2[8];
@@ -373,7 +378,8 @@ static void fwht(const u8 *block, s16 *output_block, unsigned int stride,
* Furthermore values can be negative... This is just a version that
* works with 16 signed data
*/
-static void fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
+static void noinline_for_stack
+fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
{
/* we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients */
s32 workspace1[8], workspace2[8];
@@ -456,7 +462,8 @@ static void fwht16(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int stride, int intra)
}
}
-static void ifwht(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int intra)
+static noinline_for_stack void
+ifwht(const s16 *block, s16 *output_block, int intra)
{
/*
* we'll need more than 8 bits for the transformed coefficients
@@ -604,9 +611,9 @@ static int var_inter(const s16 *old, const s16 *new)
return ret;
}
-static int decide_blocktype(const u8 *cur, const u8 *reference,
- s16 *deltablock, unsigned int stride,
- unsigned int input_step)
+static noinline_for_stack int
+decide_blocktype(const u8 *cur, const u8 *reference, s16 *deltablock,
+ unsigned int stride, unsigned int input_step)
{
s16 tmp[64];
s16 old[64];
--
2.20.0
