Em Tue, 15 Jan 2019 10:32:01 -0600 Brad Love <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi Antti, > > > On 09/01/2019 11.36, Antti Palosaari wrote: > > On 12/20/18 11:57 PM, Brad Love wrote: > >> Works in ATSC and QAM as is, DVB is completely untested. > >> > >> Firmware required. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Brad Love <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/media/tuners/si2157.c | 6 ++++++ > >> drivers/media/tuners/si2157_priv.h | 3 ++- > > > > > >> #define SI2158_A20_FIRMWARE "dvb-tuner-si2158-a20-01.fw" > >> #define SI2141_A10_FIRMWARE "dvb-tuner-si2141-a10-01.fw" > >> - > >> +#define SI2157_A30_FIRMWARE "dvb-tuner-si2157-a30-05.fw" > > > > Why you added 05 to that file name? I added that spare number for > > cases you have to replace firmware to another for some reason thus by > > default case it should be 01. > > > > Barring any explanation of the naming convention, I made it look similar > to the previous two, while reflecting the firmware version. This is > firmware 3.0.5. I have no problem "starting from 1", but reflecting the > firmware version seemed like the sane idea. I'll resubmit if desired. Hi Antti, Whatever firmware name convention policy you decide works for me, but it would be really cool if you could send a patch ading a comment just before the firmware naming macros documenting it, as it would avoid further discussions and patch resubmissions ;-) Thanks, Mauro
