On 11/12/2018 08:07 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:56 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> As was discussed here (among other places): >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440 >> >> using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is >> not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is >> welcome!) > > Maybe "tag" is more common for that kind of usage, but "cookie" is > fine as well IMHO. 'tag' is MUCH better than cookie. I'll rename and thank you for this excellent suggestion. That's really what we do: tagging buffers. Regards, Hans > > I can only comment on patches 1-4, but so far it seems to me that this > would work. I will use this to base the next stateless codec API RFC. > > Thanks! > Alex. >
