Hi Hans, On Fri, Nov 9, 2018 at 6:56 PM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As was discussed here (among other places): > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/19/440 > > using capture queue buffer indices to refer to reference frames is > not a good idea. A better idea is to use 'cookies' (a better name is > welcome!) Maybe "tag" is more common for that kind of usage, but "cookie" is fine as well IMHO. I can only comment on patches 1-4, but so far it seems to me that this would work. I will use this to base the next stateless codec API RFC. Thanks! Alex.
