Hi Tomasz, just a few thoughts I came across while writing the stateless codec document: On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 11:06 PM Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > +**************************************** > +Memory-to-memory Video Decoder Interface > +**************************************** Since we have a m2m stateless decoder interface, can we call this the m2m video *stateful* decoder interface? :) > +Conventions and notation used in this document > +============================================== [snip] > +Glossary > +======== I think these sections apply to both stateless and stateful. How about moving then into dev-codec.rst and mentioning that they apply to the two following sections?
