I found an email that discussed the similar problem that my camera had,
showing up just a black screen, it's dated but i think maybe it wasn't
fully solved because there's no answer.
http://osdir.com/ml/drivers.spca50x.devel/2006-11/msg00036.html
Note the : ">/ > /Vimicro/zc3xx.h: [zcxx_probeSensor:307] sensor 3w Vga
??? 0xC400"
/Do you know if this was solved?!
Because i suspect that maybe there are more 0x?400 revision of the chipset.
Btw, if this is a pattern could we consider to mask the bits in retword
(retword &= 0x0FFF)?
Because looking at the current table it seems to make more sense.
Best regards,
Luis Maia.
Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:25:29 -0300
leandro Costantino <lcostantino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jean,
let me know , if you need to the test this patch, since i added the
tas1530k long time ago, and still have the webcam :)
Best Regards
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Jean-Francois Moine
<moinejf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:45:00 +0000
Luis Maia <lmaia@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Added extra chipset revision (sensor) to fix camera zc0301 with
ID: 0ac8:301b .
Since i own one of this cameras fixed and tested it.
-------------
diff -uNr linux-2.6.32.1/drivers/media/video/gspca/zc3xx.c
linux-2.6.32.1-patch/drivers/media/video/gspca/zc3xx.c
--- linux-2.6.32.1/drivers/media/video/gspca/zc3xx.c 2009-12-14
17:47:25.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-2.6.32.1-patch/drivers/media/video/gspca/zc3xx.c
2009-12-15 02:42:13.000000000 +0000
@@ -6868,6 +6868,7 @@
{0x8001, 0x13},
{0x8000, 0x14}, /* CS2102K */
{0x8400, 0x15}, /* TAS5130K */
+ {0xe400, 0x15},
};
static int vga_3wr_probe(struct gspca_dev *gspca_dev)
@@ -7634,7 +7635,7 @@
{USB_DEVICE(0x0698, 0x2003)},
{USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x0301), .driver_info = SENSOR_PAS106},
{USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x0302), .driver_info = SENSOR_PAS106},
- {USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x301b)},
+ {USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x301b), .driver_info = SENSOR_PB0330},
{USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x303b)},
{USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x305b), .driver_info =
SENSOR_TAS5130C_VF0250}, {USB_DEVICE(0x0ac8, 0x307b)},
Hello Luis and Leandro,
Thanks for the patch. Luis said his sensor is the tas5130K, so the 2nd
part of the patch is useless. But, maybe, Leandro, have you heard about
other chipset revision IDs?
Best regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html