Kevin,
I think I have figured it out...
First issue was that I was adding my entry at the end of dm644x_clks[]
array. I need to add it before the CLK(NULL, NULL, NULL)
secondly, your suggestion didn't work as is. This is what I had to
do to get it working...
static struct clk ccdc_master_clk = {
.name = "dm644x_ccdc",
.parent = &vpss_master_clk,
};
static struct clk ccdc_slave_clk = {
.name = "dm644x_ccdc",
.parent = &vpss_slave_clk,
};
static struct davinci_clk dm365_clks = {
....
....
CLK("dm644x_ccdc", "master", &ccdc_master_clk),
CLK("dm644x_ccdc", "slave", &ccdc_slave_clk),
CLK(NULL, NULL, NULL);
Let me know if you think there is anything wrong with the above scheme.
Murali Karicheri
Software Design Engineer
Texas Instruments Inc.
Germantown, MD 20874
phone: 301-407-9583
email: m-karicheri2@xxxxxx
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 1:22 PM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan; Kevin Hilman
>Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [PATCH - v1 1/2] V4L - vpfe capture - make clocks configurable
>
>Kevin,
>
>I tried the following and I get error in clk_enable(). Do you know what
>might be wrong?
>
>in DM365.c
>
>CLK("isif", "master", &vpss_master_clk)
>
>The driver name is isif. I call clk_get(&pdev->dev, "master") from isif
>driver. The platform device name is "isif". This call succeeds, but
>clk_enable() fails...
>
>clk_ptr = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "master");
>clk_enable(clk_ptr);
>
>root@dm355-evm:~# cat /proc/davinci_clocks
>ref_clk users= 7 24000000 Hz
> pll1 users= 6 pll 486000000 Hz
> pll1_aux_clk users= 3 pll 24000000 Hz
> uart0 users= 1 psc 24000000 Hz
> i2c users= 1 psc 24000000 Hz
> spi4 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> pwm0 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> pwm1 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> pwm2 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> timer0 users= 1 psc 24000000 Hz
> timer1 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> timer2 users= 1 psc 24000000 Hz
> timer3 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> usb users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclkbp users= 0 pll 24000000 Hz
> clkout0 users= 0 pll 24000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk1 users= 0 pll 486000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk2 users= 0 pll 243000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk3 users= 0 pll 243000000 Hz
> vpss_dac users= 0 psc 243000000 Hz
> mjcp users= 0 psc 243000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk4 users= 3 pll 121500000 Hz
> uart1 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> mmcsd1 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> spi0 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> spi1 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> spi2 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> spi3 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> gpio users= 1 psc 121500000 Hz
> aemif users= 1 psc 121500000 Hz
> emac users= 1 psc 121500000 Hz
> asp0 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> rto users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk5 users= 0 pll 243000000 Hz
> vpss_master users= 0 psc 243000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk6 users= 0 pll 27000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk7 users= 0 pll 486000000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk8 users= 0 pll 121500000 Hz
> mmcsd0 users= 0 psc 121500000 Hz
> pll1_sysclk9 users= 0 pll 243000000 Hz
> pll2 users= 1 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_aux_clk users= 0 pll 24000000 Hz
> clkout1 users= 0 pll 24000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk1 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk2 users= 1 pll 297000000 Hz
> arm_clk users= 1 psc 297000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk3 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk4 users= 0 pll 20482758 Hz
> voice_codec users= 0 psc 20482758 Hz
> pll2_sysclk5 users= 0 pll 74250000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk6 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk7 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk8 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pll2_sysclk9 users= 0 pll 594000000 Hz
> pwm3 users= 0 psc 24000000 Hz
>root@dm355-evm:~#
>
>
>
>Murali Karicheri
>Software Design Engineer
>Texas Instruments Inc.
>Germantown, MD 20874
>phone: 301-407-9583
>email: m-karicheri2@xxxxxx
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>>Of Karicheri, Muralidharan
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2009 12:45 PM
>>To: Kevin Hilman
>>Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>>media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [PATCH - v1 1/2] V4L - vpfe capture - make clocks
>configurable
>>
>>Kevin,
>>
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * vpfe_disable_clock() - Disable clocks for vpfe capture driver
>>>> + * @vpfe_dev - ptr to vpfe capture device
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Disables clocks defined in vpfe configuration.
>>>> + */
>>>> static void vpfe_disable_clock(struct vpfe_device *vpfe_dev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct vpfe_config *vpfe_cfg = vpfe_dev->cfg;
>>>> + int i;
>>>>
>>>> - clk_disable(vpfe_cfg->vpssclk);
>>>> - clk_put(vpfe_cfg->vpssclk);
>>>> - clk_disable(vpfe_cfg->slaveclk);
>>>> - clk_put(vpfe_cfg->slaveclk);
>>>> - v4l2_info(vpfe_dev->pdev->driver,
>>>> - "vpfe vpss master & slave clocks disabled\n");
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < vpfe_cfg->num_clocks; i++) {
>>>> + clk_disable(vpfe_dev->clks[i]);
>>>> + clk_put(vpfe_dev->clks[i]);
>>>
>>>While cleaning this up, you should move the clk_put() to module
>>>disable/unload time.
>>
>>[MK] vpfe_disable_clock() is called from remove(). In the new
>>patch, from ccdc driver remove() function, clk_put() will be called.
>>Why do you think it should be moved to exit() function of the module?
>>
>>>You dont' need to put he clock on every disable.
>>>The same for clk_get(). You don't need to get the clock for every
>>>enable. Just do a clk_get() at init time.
>>
>>Are you suggesting to call clk_get() during init() and call clk_put()
>>from exit()? What is wrong with calling clk_get() from probe()?
>>I thought following is correct:-
>>Probe()
>>clk_get() followed by clk_enable()
>>Remove()
>>clk_disable() followed by clk_put()
>>Suspend()
>>clk_disable()
>>Resume()
>>clk_enable()
>>Please confirm.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
>>Davinci-linux-open-source@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
