On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 12:31:40PM +0100, Sean Young wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 04:38:03PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote: > > Doing writes when the device is disabled seems to be a NOOP. > > Let's enable the device, write the values, and then disable it on init. > > This changes the behavior for wake device, which is now being disabled > > after init. > > I don't have the datasheet so I might be misunderstanding this. We want > the IR wakeup to work fine even after kernel crash/power loss, right? [snip] Right, that makes sense. I completely ignored this scenario. > > - /* enable the CIR WAKE logical device */ > > - nvt_enable_logical_dev(nvt, LOGICAL_DEV_CIR_WAKE); > > + nvt_disable_logical_dev(nvt, LOGICAL_DEV_CIR); > > The way I read this is that the CIR, not CIR_WAKE, is being disabled, > which seems contrary to what the commit message says. > That's a typo. And by accident it makes the wake_device work correctly :) I think that registers init logic was still broken though, operating under the assumption that the device is enabled on module load... I guess we should just remove disable(LOGICAL_DEV_CIR) from wake_regs_init. Have you already included this in any non-rebasing tree? Should I send a v2 or fixup on top? -Michał > > Sean > > > } > > > > static void nvt_enable_wake(struct nvt_dev *nvt) > > -- > > 2.17.0
