Hi Jacopo,
Thanks for your work.
On 2018-05-18 16:40:41 +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> The rcar-vin driver so far had a mutually exclusive code path for
> handling parallel and CSI-2 video input subdevices, with only the CSI-2
> use case supporting media-controller. As we add support for parallel
> inputs to Gen3 media-controller compliant code path now parse both port@0
> and port@1, handling the media-controller use case in the parallel
> bound/unbind notifier operations and delay notifier registration to the
> last probing VIN instance in case we have links to setup between media
> entities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 85 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> index 0a35a98..745e8ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c
> @@ -397,6 +397,11 @@ static int rvin_parallel_subdevice_attach(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> ret = rvin_find_pad(subdev, MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK);
> vin->parallel->sink_pad = ret < 0 ? 0 : ret;
>
> + vin->parallel->subdev = subdev;
> +
> + if (vin->info->use_mc)
> + return 0;
> +
I think it would be cleaner if you wrote this as
if (vin->info->use_mc) {
vin->parallel->subdev = subdev;
return 0;
}
And then not use the goto bellow.
> /* Find compatible subdevices mbus format */
> vin->mbus_code = 0;
> code.index = 0;
> @@ -422,46 +427,52 @@ static int rvin_parallel_subdevice_attach(struct rvin_dev *vin,
> if (!vin->mbus_code) {
> vin_err(vin, "Unsupported media bus format for %s\n",
> subdev->name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto error_reset_subdev;
> }
>
> /* Read tvnorms */
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(subdev, video, g_tvnorms, &vin->vdev.tvnorms);
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD && ret != -ENODEV)
> - return ret;
> + goto error_reset_subdev;
>
> /* Read standard */
> vin->std = V4L2_STD_UNKNOWN;
> ret = v4l2_subdev_call(subdev, video, g_std, &vin->std);
> if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOIOCTLCMD)
> - return ret;
> + goto error_reset_subdev;
>
> /* Add the controls */
> ret = v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&vin->ctrl_handler, 16);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto error_reset_subdev;
>
> ret = v4l2_ctrl_add_handler(&vin->ctrl_handler, subdev->ctrl_handler,
> NULL);
> if (ret < 0) {
> v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&vin->ctrl_handler);
> - return ret;
> + goto error_reset_subdev;
> }
>
> vin->vdev.ctrl_handler = &vin->ctrl_handler;
>
> - vin->parallel->subdev = subdev;
> -
> return 0;
> +
> +error_reset_subdev:
> + vin->parallel->subdev = NULL;
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void rvin_parallel_subdevice_detach(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> {
> rvin_v4l2_unregister(vin);
> - v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&vin->ctrl_handler);
> -
> - vin->vdev.ctrl_handler = NULL;
> vin->parallel->subdev = NULL;
> +
> + if (!vin->info->use_mc) {
> + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&vin->ctrl_handler);
> + vin->vdev.ctrl_handler = NULL;
> + }
> }
>
> static int rvin_parallel_notify_complete(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier)
> @@ -551,22 +562,26 @@ static int rvin_parallel_parse_v4l2(struct device *dev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int rvin_parallel_graph_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> +static int rvin_parallel_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints(
> - vin->dev, &vin->notifier,
> - sizeof(struct rvin_parallel_entity), rvin_parallel_parse_v4l2);
> + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_parse_fwnode_endpoints_by_port(
> + vin->dev, &vin->notifier, sizeof(struct rvin_parallel_entity),
> + 0, rvin_parallel_parse_v4l2);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> if (!vin->parallel)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + return -ENOTCONN;
>
> vin_dbg(vin, "Found parallel subdevice %pOF\n",
> to_of_node(vin->parallel->asd.match.fwnode));
>
> + /* If we use media-controller, notifier registration is post-poned. */
> + if (vin->info->use_mc)
> + return 0;
Is this really needed? Se comment about CSI-2 and parallel ordering in
rcar_vin_probe() bellow.
> +
> vin->notifier.ops = &rvin_parallel_notify_ops;
> ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vin->v4l2_dev, &vin->notifier);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -766,6 +781,30 @@ static int rvin_mc_parse_of_graph(struct rvin_dev *vin)
>
> mutex_unlock(&vin->group->lock);
>
> + /*
> + * Go and register all notifiers for parallel subdevs, and
> + * the group notifier for CSI-2 subdevs, if any.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < RCAR_VIN_NUM; i++) {
> + struct rvin_dev *ivin = vin->group->vin[i];
> + struct v4l2_async_notifier *inotifier;
> +
> + if (!ivin)
> + continue;
> +
> + inotifier = &ivin->notifier;
> + if (!inotifier->num_subdevs)
> + continue;
> +
> + inotifier->ops = &rvin_parallel_notify_ops;
> + ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&ivin->v4l2_dev, inotifier);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + vin_err(ivin,
> + "Notifier registration failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto error_unregister_notifiers;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!vin->group->notifier.num_subdevs)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -773,25 +812,29 @@ static int rvin_mc_parse_of_graph(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> ret = v4l2_async_notifier_register(&vin->v4l2_dev,
> &vin->group->notifier);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - vin_err(vin, "Notifier registration failed\n");
> + vin_err(vin, "Notifier registration failed: %d\n", ret);
I won't object to this, if you think the return value is useful for
user-space please keep it. But break it out to it's own patch :-)
> return ret;
> }
>
> return 0;
> +
> +error_unregister_notifiers:
> + for (i = 0; i < RCAR_VIN_NUM; i++) {
> + if (!vin->group->vin[i])
> + continue;
> +
> + v4l2_async_notifier_unregister(&vin->group->vin[i]->notifier);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int rvin_mc_init(struct rvin_dev *vin)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - vin->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> - ret = media_entity_pads_init(&vin->vdev.entity, 1, &vin->pad);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = rvin_group_get(vin);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (!vin->info->use_mc)
> + return 0;
>
> ret = rvin_mc_parse_of_graph(vin);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1074,13 +1117,26 @@ static int rcar_vin_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vin);
> - if (vin->info->use_mc)
> - ret = rvin_mc_init(vin);
> - else
> - ret = rvin_parallel_graph_init(vin);
> - if (ret < 0)
> +
> + if (vin->info->use_mc) {
> + vin->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK;
> + ret = media_entity_pads_init(&vin->vdev.entity, 1, &vin->pad);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = rvin_group_get(vin);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = rvin_parallel_init(vin);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTCONN)
> goto error;
>
> + ret = rvin_mc_init(vin);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
I think that if you first call rvin_mc_init() and then
rvin_parallel_init() you can remove the delay of registering the VIN
local notifier as the media device will have then been created and there
is no reason to delay the notifier registration. And in the process this
patch becomes much simpler (I think).
> pm_suspend_ignore_children(&pdev->dev, true);
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
