Hi, this series removes the init() callback from pxa_camera_platform_data, and fixes its users to do initialization statically at machine init time. Guennadi requested this change because there seems to be no use cases for dynamic initialization. I also believe that the current semantics for this init() callback is ambiguous anyways, it is invoked in pxa_camera_activate(), hence at device node open, but its users use it like a generic initialization to be done at module init time (configure MFP, request GPIOs for *sensor* control). So removing it is definitely good. As a side note, If we were really exposing some dynamic and generic initialization, this could be done in soc-camera itself, not in pxa_camera anyways. Thanks, Antonio Antonio Ospite (3): em-x270: don't use pxa_camera init() callback pcm990-baseboard: don't use pxa_camera init() callback pxa_camera: remove init() callback arch/arm/mach-pxa/em-x270.c | 9 +++++---- arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/camera.h | 2 -- arch/arm/mach-pxa/pcm990-baseboard.c | 8 +------- drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c | 10 ---------- 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
