Hi Hans and Patrick, On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 01:37:33PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > On 04/10/2017 10:13 PM, Patrick Doyle wrote: > > I am looking for advice regarding the construction of a device driver > > for a MIPI CSI2 imager (a Sony IMX241) that is connected to a > > MIPI<->Parallel converter (Toshiba TC358748) wired into a parallel > > interface on a Soc (a Microchip/Atmel SAMAD2x device.) > > > > The Sony imager is controlled and configured via I2C, as is the > > Toshiba converter. I could write a single driver that configures both > > devices and treats them as a single device that just happens to use 2 > > i2c addresses. I could use the i2c_new_dummy() API to construct the > > device abstraction for the second physical device at probe time for > > the first physical device. > > > > Or I could do something smarter (or at least different), specifying > > the two devices independently via my device tree file, perhaps linking > > them together via "port" nodes. Currently, I use the "port" node > > concept to link an i2c imager to the Image System Controller (isc) > > node in the SAMA5 device. Perhaps that generalizes to a chain of > > nodes linked together... I don't know. > > That would be the right solution. Unfortunately the atmel-isc.c driver > (at least the version in the mainline kernel) only supports a single > subdev device. At least, as far as I can see. There have been multiple cases recently where the media pipeline can have sub-devices controlled by more than two drivers. We need to have a common approach on how we do handle such cases. For instance, how is the entire DT graph parsed or when and how are the device nodes created? Parsing the graph should probably be initiated by the master driver but instead implemented in the framework as it's a non-trivial task and common to all such drivers. Another equestion is how do we best support this also on existing drivers. I actually have a small documentation patch on handling streaming control in such cases as there are choices now to be made not thought about when the sub-device ops were originally addeed. I'll cc you to that. We do have a similar case currently in i.MX6, Nokia N9 (OMAP3) and on some Renesas hardware unless I'm mistaken. Cc Niklas. -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
