Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 02:09:16PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
>
> On Friday 07 Apr 2017 13:58:06 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 01:32:54PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Thursday 06 Apr 2017 16:12:07 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > Switch users of the v4l2_of_ APIs to the more generic v4l2_fwnode_ APIs.
> > > >
> > > > Existing OF matching continues to be supported. omap3isp and smiapp
> > > > drivers are converted to fwnode matching as well.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Acked-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx> # i2c/ov2569.c,
> > > > am437x/am437x-vpfe.c and ti-vpe/cal.c ---
> > > >
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 9 ++++
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/adv7604.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/mt9v032.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/ov2659.c | 8 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/s5c73m3/s5c73m3-core.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/s5k5baf.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c | 29 ++++++-----
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c | 11 ++--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/tvp514x.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/tvp5150.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/i2c/tvp7002.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 3 ++
> > > > drivers/media/platform/am437x/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/am437x/am437x-vpfe.c | 8 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/atmel/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/atmel/atmel-isc.c | 8 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/Kconfig | 2 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/media-dev.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/mipi-csis.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c | 71 +++++++++---------
> > > > drivers/media/platform/pxa_camera.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/rcar-vin/rcar-core.c | 6 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/atmel-isi.c | 7 +--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 3 +-
> > > > drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c | 11 ++--
> > > > drivers/media/platform/xilinx/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > > drivers/media/platform/xilinx/xilinx-vipp.c | 59 +++++++++---------
> > > > include/media/v4l2-fwnode.h | 4 +-
> > > > 31 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > > > index cee1dae..6b2423a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig
> > > > @@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ config VIDEO_ADV7604
> > > >
> > > > depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> > > > select HDMI
> > > > select MEDIA_CEC_EDID
> > > >
> > > > + select V4L2_FWNODE
> > >
> > > What happens when building the driver on a platform that includes neither
> > > OF nor ACPI support ?
> >
> > You need either in practice, also for the V4L2 fwnode to be meaningful.
> >
> > Do you have something in particular in mind?
>
> I will obviously need either OF or ACPI to use the fwnode API, but some
> drivers still support platform data (either on non-OF embedded systems, or
> when the I2C device is part of a PCI card for instance). Compile-testing is
> also a use case I'm concerned about.
Ah, so essentially compiling a driver using V4L2 fwnode with both ACPI and
OF disabled? I don't know if there are such drivers right now but that's a
good point in general.
>
> [snip]
>
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > > > b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c index 084ecf4a..95850b9 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.c
> > >
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > @@ -2024,43 +2025,42 @@ enum isp_of_phy {
> > > > ISP_OF_PHY_CSIPHY2,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > -static int isp_of_parse_node(struct device *dev, struct device_node
> > > > *node,
> > > > - struct isp_async_subdev *isd)
> > > > +static int isp_fwnode_parse(struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle
> > > > *fwn,
> > > > + struct isp_async_subdev *isd)
> > > > {
> > > > struct isp_bus_cfg *buscfg = &isd->bus;
> > > > - struct v4l2_of_endpoint vep;
> > > > + struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint vfwn;
> > >
> > > vfwn is confusing to me, I think the variable name should show that it
> > > refers to an endpoint.
> >
> > How about adding ep to tell it's an endpoint?
>
> I'd name is vep or endpoint.
I'll use "vep". "fwnode" for struct fwnode_handle pointers, it is an
established practice elsewhere.
>
> > > > unsigned int i;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > - ret = v4l2_of_parse_endpoint(node, &vep);
> > > > + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_parse(fwn, &vfwn);
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > - dev_dbg(dev, "parsing endpoint %s, interface %u\n", node->full_name,
> > > > - vep.base.port);
> > > > + dev_dbg(dev, "interface %u\n", vfwn.base.port);
> > >
> > > Is there no way to keep the node name in the error message ?
> >
> > There's no generic fwnode means to do something similar currently, possibly
> > because I understand ACPI doesn't do that. One could check whether the node
> > is an OF node and then use the full_name field but I wonder if it's worth
> > it.
>
> My ACPI knowledge is limited, but don't ACPI nodes have 4 character names that
> can be combined in a string to create a full path ?
There is something, yes, but the ACPI framework currently has no such
functionality. I believe it could be implemented though. Cc Mika.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
