Moi! :-) On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:53:22PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Ok, I got the camera sensor to work. No subdevices support, so I don't > > > have focus (etc) working, but that's a start. I also had to remove > > > video-bus-switch support; but I guess it will be easier to use > > > video-multiplexer patches... > > > > > > I'll have patches over weekend. > > > > I briefly looked at what's there --- you do miss the video nodes for the > > non-sensor sub-devices, and they also don't show up in the media graph, > > right? > > Yes. > > > I guess they don't end up matching in the async list. > > How should they get to the async list? The patch you referred to does that. The problem is, it does make the bus configuration a pointer as well. There should be two patches. That's not a lot of work to separate them though. But it should be done. > > > I think we need to make the non-sensor sub-device support more generic; > > it's not just the OMAP 3 ISP that needs it. I think we need to document > > the property for the flash phandle as well; I can write one, or refresh > > an existing one that I believe already exists. > > > > How about calling it either simply "flash" or "camera-flash"? Similarly > > for lens: "lens" or "camera-lens". I have a vague feeling the "camera-" > > prefix is somewhat redundant, so I'd just go for "flash" or "lens". > > Actually, I'd go for "flash" and "focus-coil". There may be other > lens properties, such as zoom, mirror movement, lens identification, > ... Good point. Still there may be other ways to move the lens than the voice coil (which sure is cheap), so how about "flash" and "lens-focus"? -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
