Hi Vincent,
On 28/10/16 09:52, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:23:24PM +0200, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
video_device_release() takes a pointer to struct video_device as argument.
Fix two call sites where the address of the pointer is passed instead.
Sorry, I messed up: please ignore that "fix". The 0day robot made me
realize this is indeed not a proper fix.
The issue remains, though: we cannot call video_device_release() on the
vdev structure member, as this will in turn call kfree(). Most probably,
vdev needs to be dynamically allocated, or the call to
video_device_release() dropped completely.
I prefer that vdev is dynamically allocated. There are known problems with
embedded video_device structs, so allocating it is preferred.
Minghsiu, can you do that?
Regards,
Hans
Sorry for the bad patch.
Best regards,
Vincent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
