I've just measured that it takes 150 us in average for pwc_isoc_handler to run 350 us - __usb_hcd_giveback_urb So, it takes either 50 us (with HCD_BH) or 400 us (without) for usb_hcd_giveback_urb to run. 2016-08-20 21:09 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: > I've just checked 4.8-rc2 - same behaviour. > > 2016-08-18 16:31 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> Any ideas? >> >> 2016-08-04 23:08 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> When DMA is not used, I see the same behavior: lots of zero-length >>> packages received. >>> >>> Can It be related to some kind of USB overflow due to long input data >>> processing with disabled IRQ? >>> When HCD_BC is used then part of processing is postponed and this can >>> explain greater throughput due to better latency. >>> >>> 2016-08-04 22:58 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> I've just found that in such cases, when DMA actual length is zero, >>>> both cppi41_channel->prog_len and txstate.residue equal 960 at >>>> musb_cppi41 line 225: >>>> >>>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c#n225 >>>> >>>> 2016-08-04 22:08 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> I've just found that dma->actual_len equals to zero in most cases at >>>>> musb_host.c line 1946. >>>>> And this produces zero-length packages. >>>>> >>>>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/usb/musb/musb_host.c#n1946 >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas why? >>>>> >>>>> 2016-08-04 19:57 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>> I've just found that many packages in URBs have zero actual_length (It >>>>>> is a question why). >>>>>> Then the following end of frame criteria leads to `frame underflow' message: >>>>>> >>>>>> if (flen < pdev->vlast_packet_size) { >>>>>> /* Shorter packet... end of frame */ >>>>>> if (pdev->vsync == 2) >>>>>> pwc_frame_complete(pdev); >>>>>> if (pdev->fill_buf == NULL) >>>>>> pdev->fill_buf = pwc_get_next_fill_buf(pdev); >>>>>> if (pdev->fill_buf) { >>>>>> pdev->fill_buf->filled = 0; >>>>>> pdev->vsync = 1; >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> 2016-08-01 21:16 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>> pwc module output with trace=511 is the following: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [ 24.793109] usbcore: registered new interface driver Philips webcam >>>>>>> [ 29.276979] pwc: Unsupported pixel format >>>>>>> [ 29.277055] pwc: pwc_vidioc_fill_fmt() width=640, height=480, >>>>>>> bytesperline=640, sizeimage=460800, pixelformat=YU12 >>>>>>> [ 29.277090] pwc: Trying to set format to: width=640 height=480 >>>>>>> fps=15 format=YU12 >>>>>>> [ 29.277123] pwc: set_video_mode(640x480 @ 30, pixfmt 32315559). >>>>>>> [ 29.277145] pwc: decode_size = 5. >>>>>>> [ 29.277180] pwc: frame_size=63120, vframes=15, vsize=5, vbandlength=526 >>>>>>> [ 29.277204] pwc: Set resolution to 640x480 >>>>>>> [ 29.277225] pwc: pwc_set_video_mode(), return=0 >>>>>>> [ 29.277256] pwc: pwc_vidioc_fill_fmt() width=640, height=480, >>>>>>> bytesperline=640, sizeimage=460800, pixelformat=YU12 >>>>>>> [ 29.277306] pwc: ioctl(VIDIOC_G_FMT) return size 640x480 >>>>>>> [ 29.277337] pwc: pwc_vidioc_fill_fmt() width=640, height=480, >>>>>>> bytesperline=640, sizeimage=460800, pixelformat=YU12 >>>>>>> [ 29.277449] pwc: set_video_mode(640x480 @ 10, pixfmt 32315559). >>>>>>> [ 29.277475] pwc: decode_size = 5. >>>>>>> [ 29.278726] pwc: frame_size=94560, vframes=10, vsize=5, vbandlength=788 >>>>>>> [ 29.278750] pwc: Set resolution to 640x480 >>>>>>> [ 29.300374] pwc: set_video_mode(640x480 @ 10, pixfmt 32315559). >>>>>>> [ 29.300420] pwc: decode_size = 5. >>>>>>> [ 29.441759] pwc: frame_size=94560, vframes=10, vsize=5, vbandlength=788 >>>>>>> [ 29.441792] pwc: Set resolution to 640x480 >>>>>>> [ 29.441824] pwc: Setting alternate interface 9 >>>>>>> [ 29.455061] pwc: Allocated URB at 0xc9b83600 >>>>>>> [ 29.455850] pwc: Allocated URB at 0xc9b83400 >>>>>>> [ 29.456040] pwc: Allocated URB at 0xc9b83200 >>>>>>> [ 29.456271] pwc: URB 0xc9b83600 submitted. >>>>>>> [ 29.456310] pwc: URB 0xc9b83400 submitted. >>>>>>> [ 29.456341] pwc: URB 0xc9b83200 submitted. >>>>>>> [ 29.456362] pwc: << pwc_isoc_init() >>>>>>> [ 30.078550] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (20076 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.170543] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (12428 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.272538] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (14340 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.374541] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (16252 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.476535] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (18164 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.578532] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (20076 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.670538] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (12428 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.772544] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (14340 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.874547] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (16252 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 30.976552] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (18164 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.078536] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (20076 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.170533] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (12428 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.272549] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (14340 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.374545] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (16252 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.476537] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (18164 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.578536] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (20076 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.660895] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (11472 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.772554] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (14340 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.874548] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (16252 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> [ 31.976533] pwc: Frame buffer underflow (18164 bytes); discarded. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-07-31 23:31 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I've also just found that the same commit breaks cpufreq on BeagleBone Black :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, probably without HCD_BH flag musb works correctly only at 1Ghz CPU >>>>>>>> frequency, which is unlisted and being set to 720Mhz by cpufreq driver >>>>>>>> (as it did whet there was cpufreq driver). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2016-07-29 21:01 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've found that the following commit fixes the issue: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> commit 7694ca6e1d6f01122f05039b81f70f64b1ec4063 >>>>>>>>> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Apr 22 16:58:42 2016 +0530 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> cpufreq: omap: Use generic platdev driver >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The cpufreq-dt-platdev driver supports creation of cpufreq-dt platform >>>>>>>>> device now, reuse that and remove similar code from platform code. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2016-07-28 19:16 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I've just bisected commit, which fixed the issue in v4.7 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> commit 9fa64d6424adabf0e3a546ae24d01a62a927b342 >>>>>>>>>> Merge: f55532a febce40 >>>>>>>>>> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>> Date: Sat Apr 2 01:07:17 2016 +0200 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Merge back intel_pstate fixes for v4.6. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> * pm-cpufreq: >>>>>>>>>> intel_pstate: Avoid extra invocation of intel_pstate_sample() >>>>>>>>>> intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too early >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, intel_pstate branch doesn't have >>>>>>>>>> f551e13529833e052f75ec628a8af7b034af20f9 applied. >>>>>>>>>> I'll try to bisect this branch with the patch manually applied. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-27 20:34 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I've just biseced commit, which introduced this issue >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> commit f551e13529833e052f75ec628a8af7b034af20f9 >>>>>>>>>>> Author: Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon Apr 25 15:53:30 2016 -0500 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Revert "usb: musb: musb_host: Enable HCD_BH flag to handle urb >>>>>>>>>>> return in bottom half" >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have not checked yet, if it was intentionnaly fixed. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-23 22:24 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 21:56 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 18:06 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 05:44:56PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-07-20 17:13 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:09:42AM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> 2016-07-20 0:34 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:25:44AM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> 2016-07-19 23:56 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:21:17PM +0300, matwey@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> I have Philips SPC 900 camera (0471:0329) connected to my AM335x based BeagleBoneBlack SBC. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> I am sure that both of them are fine and work properly. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> I am running Linux 4.6.4 (my kernel config is available at https://clck.ru/A2kQs ) and I've just discovered, that there is an issue with frame transfer when high resolution formats are used. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> The issue is the following. I use simple v4l2 example tool (taken from API docs), which source code is available at http://pastebin.com/grcNXxfe >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> When I use (see line 488) 640x480 frames >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 640; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 480; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> then I get "select timeout" and don't get any frames. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> When I use 320x240 frames >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 320; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 240; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> then about 60% frames are missed. An example outpout of ./a.out -f is available at https://yadi.sk/d/aRka8xWPtSc4y >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> It looks like there are pauses between bulks of frames (frame counter and timestamp as returned from v4l2 API): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 3 3705.142553 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 8 3705.342533 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 13 3705.542517 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 110 3708.776208 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 115 3708.976190 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 120 3709.176169 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 125 3709.376152 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 130 3709.576144 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 226 3712.807848 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> When I use tiny 160x120 frames >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 160; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 120; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> then more frames are received. See output example at https://yadi.sk/d/DedBmH6ftSc9t >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> That is why I thought that everything was fine in May when used tiny xawtv window to check kernel OOPS presence (see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg141188.html for reference) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Even more. When I introduce USB hub between the host and the webcam, I can not receive even any 320x240 frames. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> I've managed to use ftrace to see what is going on when no frames are received. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> I've found that pwc_isoc_handler is called frequently as the following: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | pwc_isoc_handler [pwc]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_submit_urb [usbcore]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_submit_urb.part.3 [usbcore]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_hcd_submit_urb [usbcore]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.834 us | usb_get_urb [usbcore](); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | musb_map_urb_for_dma [musb_hdrc]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.792 us | usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma [usbcore](); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 5.750 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | musb_urb_enqueue [musb_hdrc]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.750 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep [usbcore]() { >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.792 us | _raw_spin_lock(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.791 us | _raw_spin_unlock(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 10.500 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.791 us | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 25.375 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 45.208 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 51.042 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 56.084 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 61.292 us | } >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> However, pwc_isoc_handler never calls vb2_buffer_done() that is why I get "select timeout" in userspace. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Unfortunately, my kernel is not compiled with CONFIG_USB_PWC_DEBUG=y but I can recompile it, if you think that it could provide more information. I am also ready to perform additional tests (use usbmon maybe?). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> How could this issue be resolved? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > Do you have CPPI DMA enabled? If so I think you might hit on a known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > issue in CPPI Isoch transfer, in which the MUSB controller only sends IN >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > tokens in every other SOF, so only half of the bus bandwidth is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > utilized, which causes video frame drops in higher resolution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> Yes, I do use DMA: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI41_DMA=y >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > Okay. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > To confirm this, use a bus analyzer to capture a bus trace, you would >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > see no IN tokens in every other SOF while transfering Isoch packets. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> I am sorry, I am new to USB debugging. Do you mean I need to use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> usbmon or some external hardware device? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > I barely use usbmon, and not sure if it gives the information I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > looking for. But I meant the external test equipment - USB bus protocol >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > analyzer - a bus packet sniffer. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Now I see. I've googled it, they start from $1000, I don't know >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> when/whether/where I can get one to try. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I think you might be able to check it without a sniffer - MUSB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > controller can generate SOF interrupts, but it is masked in current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > driver. So I think you could enable SOF interrupt, then if you get a log >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > or >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > which means your issue is different from the one I mentioned. But if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > you get a log as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF <--- no rx packets in two consecutive SOFs >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > rx packet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > SOF >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > then you hit on the known issue I mentioned. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Until that, could I check something else? For instance, disable >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI41_DMA. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > You could disable it, but I don't think you will get yuv video stream >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > of 640x480@30fps. PIO mode does not support such high bandwidth. What is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > your video requirement anyway? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Many thanks for your guidance. I will answer the rest later when will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be ready to play with SOF interrupt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I would like to say that use_dma=0 doesn't change the behaviour: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # cat /sys/module/musb_hdrc/parameters/use_dma >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> N >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It sounds like you have a different issue here. With usb_dma=0, I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> remembered I can get 320x240 YUV stream @30fps from uvc cameras. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like 640x480@5fps which works with x86 based PC. Issue here, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that I can not obtain 640x480 at any FPS on musb. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The current CPPI41 driver should be able to handle this. I think you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> really have to debug the pwc driver to figure out why it drops the video >>>>>>>>>>>>>> frame. I personally don't have a pwc supported camera, never looked the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pwc driver... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Surprisingly, I've found that my 10-year-old laptop (Intel Core Solo >>>>>>>>>>>>> T1350) has the similar issue with pwc (kernel 3.16). It drops 80% of >>>>>>>>>>>>> 640x480 frames. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Vortex86 200Mhz based rugged PC with 2.6.14 works fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Quad-code Atom E3800 based PC with 4.1 also works fine. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I even don't know what to say. Probably, the issue depends on CPU >>>>>>>>>>>>> latency/performance and it was there for a while. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fortunately, I think, I could use git bisect if I found latest forking >>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel for my laptop. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It seems that the issue is gone in 4.7-rc7, so forget it. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I've found that after hours of transmit, the camera stops iso at all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> (until reset). Maybe its brain becomes damaged by the transfer issues >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > How did you check that? MUSB stopped generating RX EP interrupt? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something like that, I suppose. Normally, I see input data flow in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> usbmon, but don't see frames in v4l2. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But when camera 'hungs', I don't see nor input flow (except the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control packages exchange) neither frames. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fair enough. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Bin. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> With best regards, >>>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> With best regards, >>>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> With best regards, >>>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> With best regards, >>> Matwey V. Kornilov. >>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 >> >> >> >> -- >> With best regards, >> Matwey V. Kornilov. >> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia >> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 > > > > -- > With best regards, > Matwey V. Kornilov. > Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia > 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 -- With best regards, Matwey V. Kornilov. Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
