Hello,
I've just biseced commit, which introduced this issue
commit f551e13529833e052f75ec628a8af7b034af20f9
Author: Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon Apr 25 15:53:30 2016 -0500
Revert "usb: musb: musb_host: Enable HCD_BH flag to handle urb
return in bottom half"
I have not checked yet, if it was intentionnaly fixed.
2016-07-23 22:24 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 2016-07-20 21:56 GMT+03:00 Matwey V. Kornilov <matwey@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 2016-07-20 18:06 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 05:44:56PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>>> 2016-07-20 17:13 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>:
>>>> > Hi,
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:09:42AM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>>> >> 2016-07-20 0:34 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>:
>>>> >> > Hi,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:25:44AM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote:
>>>> >> >> 2016-07-19 23:56 GMT+03:00 Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx>:
>>>> >> >> > Hi,
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:21:17PM +0300, matwey@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>> >> >> >> Hello,
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> I have Philips SPC 900 camera (0471:0329) connected to my AM335x based BeagleBoneBlack SBC.
>>>> >> >> >> I am sure that both of them are fine and work properly.
>>>> >> >> >> I am running Linux 4.6.4 (my kernel config is available at https://clck.ru/A2kQs ) and I've just discovered, that there is an issue with frame transfer when high resolution formats are used.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> The issue is the following. I use simple v4l2 example tool (taken from API docs), which source code is available at http://pastebin.com/grcNXxfe
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> When I use (see line 488) 640x480 frames
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 640;
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 480;
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> then I get "select timeout" and don't get any frames.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> When I use 320x240 frames
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 320;
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 240;
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> then about 60% frames are missed. An example outpout of ./a.out -f is available at https://yadi.sk/d/aRka8xWPtSc4y
>>>> >> >> >> It looks like there are pauses between bulks of frames (frame counter and timestamp as returned from v4l2 API):
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> 3 3705.142553
>>>> >> >> >> 8 3705.342533
>>>> >> >> >> 13 3705.542517
>>>> >> >> >> 110 3708.776208
>>>> >> >> >> 115 3708.976190
>>>> >> >> >> 120 3709.176169
>>>> >> >> >> 125 3709.376152
>>>> >> >> >> 130 3709.576144
>>>> >> >> >> 226 3712.807848
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> When I use tiny 160x120 frames
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.width = 160;
>>>> >> >> >> fmt.fmt.pix.height = 120;
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> then more frames are received. See output example at https://yadi.sk/d/DedBmH6ftSc9t
>>>> >> >> >> That is why I thought that everything was fine in May when used tiny xawtv window to check kernel OOPS presence (see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg141188.html for reference)
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Even more. When I introduce USB hub between the host and the webcam, I can not receive even any 320x240 frames.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> I've managed to use ftrace to see what is going on when no frames are received.
>>>> >> >> >> I've found that pwc_isoc_handler is called frequently as the following:
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | pwc_isoc_handler [pwc]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_submit_urb [usbcore]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_submit_urb.part.3 [usbcore]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_hcd_submit_urb [usbcore]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.834 us | usb_get_urb [usbcore]();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | musb_map_urb_for_dma [musb_hdrc]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.792 us | usb_hcd_map_urb_for_dma [usbcore]();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 5.750 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | musb_urb_enqueue [musb_hdrc]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.750 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) | usb_hcd_link_urb_to_ep [usbcore]() {
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.792 us | _raw_spin_lock();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.791 us | _raw_spin_unlock();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 10.500 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) 0.791 us | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore();
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 25.375 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 45.208 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 51.042 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 56.084 us | }
>>>> >> >> >> 0) + 61.292 us | }
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> However, pwc_isoc_handler never calls vb2_buffer_done() that is why I get "select timeout" in userspace.
>>>> >> >> >> Unfortunately, my kernel is not compiled with CONFIG_USB_PWC_DEBUG=y but I can recompile it, if you think that it could provide more information. I am also ready to perform additional tests (use usbmon maybe?).
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> How could this issue be resolved?
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Thank you.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Do you have CPPI DMA enabled? If so I think you might hit on a known
>>>> >> >> > issue in CPPI Isoch transfer, in which the MUSB controller only sends IN
>>>> >> >> > tokens in every other SOF, so only half of the bus bandwidth is
>>>> >> >> > utilized, which causes video frame drops in higher resolution.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Yes, I do use DMA:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI41_DMA=y
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Okay.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> > To confirm this, use a bus analyzer to capture a bus trace, you would
>>>> >> >> > see no IN tokens in every other SOF while transfering Isoch packets.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I am sorry, I am new to USB debugging. Do you mean I need to use
>>>> >> >> usbmon or some external hardware device?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I barely use usbmon, and not sure if it gives the information I am
>>>> >> > looking for. But I meant the external test equipment - USB bus protocol
>>>> >> > analyzer - a bus packet sniffer.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Now I see. I've googled it, they start from $1000, I don't know
>>>> >> when/whether/where I can get one to try.
>>>> >
>>>> > I think you might be able to check it without a sniffer - MUSB
>>>> > controller can generate SOF interrupts, but it is masked in current
>>>> > driver. So I think you could enable SOF interrupt, then if you get a log
>>>> > as
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > ...
>>>> > or
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > ...
>>>> >
>>>> > which means your issue is different from the one I mentioned. But if
>>>> > you get a log as
>>>> >
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > SOF <--- no rx packets in two consecutive SOFs
>>>> > rx packet
>>>> > SOF
>>>> > SOF
>>>> >
>>>> > then you hit on the known issue I mentioned.
>>>> >
>>>> >> Until that, could I check something else? For instance, disable
>>>> >> CONFIG_USB_TI_CPPI41_DMA.
>>>> >
>>>> > You could disable it, but I don't think you will get yuv video stream
>>>> > of 640x480@30fps. PIO mode does not support such high bandwidth. What is
>>>> > your video requirement anyway?
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks for your guidance. I will answer the rest later when will
>>>> be ready to play with SOF interrupt.
>>>> Now, I would like to say that use_dma=0 doesn't change the behaviour:
>>>>
>>>> # cat /sys/module/musb_hdrc/parameters/use_dma
>>>> N
>>>
>>> It sounds like you have a different issue here. With usb_dma=0, I
>>> remembered I can get 320x240 YUV stream @30fps from uvc cameras.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like 640x480@5fps which works with x86 based PC. Issue here,
>>>> that I can not obtain 640x480 at any FPS on musb.
>>>
>>> The current CPPI41 driver should be able to handle this. I think you
>>> really have to debug the pwc driver to figure out why it drops the video
>>> frame. I personally don't have a pwc supported camera, never looked the
>>> pwc driver...
>>
>> Surprisingly, I've found that my 10-year-old laptop (Intel Core Solo
>> T1350) has the similar issue with pwc (kernel 3.16). It drops 80% of
>> 640x480 frames.
>> Vortex86 200Mhz based rugged PC with 2.6.14 works fine.
>> Quad-code Atom E3800 based PC with 4.1 also works fine.
>>
>> So, I even don't know what to say. Probably, the issue depends on CPU
>> latency/performance and it was there for a while.
>> Fortunately, I think, I could use git bisect if I found latest forking
>> kernel for my laptop.
>>
>
> It seems that the issue is gone in 4.7-rc7, so forget it.
>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I've found that after hours of transmit, the camera stops iso at all
>>>> >> (until reset). Maybe its brain becomes damaged by the transfer issues
>>>> >
>>>> > How did you check that? MUSB stopped generating RX EP interrupt?
>>>>
>>>> Something like that, I suppose. Normally, I see input data flow in
>>>> usbmon, but don't see frames in v4l2.
>>>> But when camera 'hungs', I don't see nor input flow (except the
>>>> control packages exchange) neither frames.
>>>
>>> Fair enough.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Bin.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best regards,
>> Matwey V. Kornilov.
>> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
>> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Matwey V. Kornilov.
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
> 119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382
--
With best regards,
Matwey V. Kornilov.
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia
119991, Moscow, Universitetsky pr-k 13, +7 (495) 9392382
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
