Hi Sakari,
On 07/21/2016 01:14 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Preparation for refactoring media IOCTL handling to unify common parts.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/media-device.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/media-device.c b/drivers/media/media-device.c
> index 1795abe..3ac526d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/media-device.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/media-device.c
> @@ -419,13 +419,33 @@ static long media_device_get_topology(struct media_device *mdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static long media_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> - unsigned long arg)
> +#define MEDIA_IOC(__cmd) \
> + [_IOC_NR(MEDIA_IOC_##__cmd)] = { .cmd = MEDIA_IOC_##__cmd }
> +
> +/* the table is indexed by _IOC_NR(cmd) */
> +struct media_ioctl_info {
> + unsigned int cmd;
> +};
> +
> +static inline long is_valid_ioctl(const struct media_ioctl_info *info,
> + unsigned int len, unsigned int cmd)
> +{
> + return (_IOC_NR(cmd) >= len
> + || info[_IOC_NR(cmd)].cmd != cmd) ? -ENOIOCTLCMD : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long __media_device_ioctl(
> + struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, void __user *arg,
> + const struct media_ioctl_info *info_array, unsigned int info_array_len)
> {
> struct media_devnode *devnode = media_devnode_data(filp);
> struct media_device *dev = devnode->media_dev;
> long ret;
>
> + ret = is_valid_ioctl(info_array, info_array_len, cmd);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> mutex_lock(&dev->graph_mutex);
> switch (cmd) {
> case MEDIA_IOC_DEVICE_INFO:
> @@ -461,6 +481,22 @@ static long media_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static const struct media_ioctl_info ioctl_info[] = {
> + MEDIA_IOC(DEVICE_INFO),
> + MEDIA_IOC(ENUM_ENTITIES),
> + MEDIA_IOC(ENUM_LINKS),
> + MEDIA_IOC(SETUP_LINK),
> + MEDIA_IOC(G_TOPOLOGY),
> +};
Why not move this up and use ARRAY_SIZE instead of having to pass the length around?
> +
> +static long media_device_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return __media_device_ioctl(
> + filp, cmd, (void __user *)arg,
> + ioctl_info, ARRAY_SIZE(ioctl_info));
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>
> struct media_links_enum32 {
> @@ -491,6 +527,14 @@ static long media_device_enum_links32(struct media_device *mdev,
>
> #define MEDIA_IOC_ENUM_LINKS32 _IOWR('|', 0x02, struct media_links_enum32)
>
> +static const struct media_ioctl_info compat_ioctl_info[] = {
> + MEDIA_IOC(DEVICE_INFO),
> + MEDIA_IOC(ENUM_ENTITIES),
> + MEDIA_IOC(ENUM_LINKS32),
> + MEDIA_IOC(SETUP_LINK),
> + MEDIA_IOC(G_TOPOLOGY),
> +};
I assume the size of the compat array will always be the same as that of the 'regular' array.
In fact, you should probably test for that (the compiler should be able to catch that).
> +
> static long media_device_compat_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
>
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
