Re: Sony imx219 driver?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 07/21/2016 08:19 PM, Dave Stevenson wrote:
> Hi All.
> 
> Just a quick query to avoid duplicating effort. Has anyone worked on a 
> Sony IMX219 (or other Sony sensor) subdevice driver as yet?

Not that I am aware of.

> With the new Raspberry Pi camera being IMX219, and as Broadcom have 
> released an soc_camera based driver for the sensor already 
> (https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/bcm/+/android-bcm-tetra-3.10-lollipop-wear-release/drivers/media/video/imx219.c) 

#@!@$! Why do they never ever ask us what would be a good example driver to use. The
soc-camera framework is deprecated and will likely be gone by the end of the year.

> I was going to investigate converting that to a subdevice. I just wanted 
> to check this wasn't already in someone else's work queue.
> 
> A further Google shows that there's also an soc_camera IMX219 driver in 
> ChromiumOS, copyright Andrew Chew @ Nvidia, but author Guennadi 
> Liakhovetski who I know posts on here. 
> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/factory-ryu-6486.14.B-chromeos-3.14/drivers/media/i2c/soc_camera/imx219.c. 

At least for the tegra there is a proper non-soc-camera driver in the works.

> The Broadcom one supports 8MPix and 1080P, the Chromium one only 8MP. 
> Perhaps a hybrid of the feature set?

They usually only implement what they need, so I'd say for chromium they only needed 8MP support.

> Throw in 
> https://github.com/ZenfoneArea/android_kernel_asus_zenfone5/blob/master/linux/modules/camera/drivers/media/i2c/imx219/imx219.h 
> as well, and we have register sets for numerous readout modes, plus 
> there are the ones in the Pi firmware which can be extracted if necessary.

With all that code it shouldn't be hard to write a proper subdev driver.

> 
> On a related note, if putting together a system with IMX219 or similar 
> producing Bayer raw 10, the data on the CSI2 bus is one of the 
> V4L2_PIX_FMT_SRGGB10P formats. What's the correct way to reflect that 
> from the sensor subdevice in an MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ enum?
> The closest is MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_2X8_PADHI_BE (or LE), but the data 
> isn't padded (the Pi CSI2 receiver can do the unpacking and padding, but 
> that just takes up more memory).|||| Or is it MEDIA_BUS_FMT_SBGGR10_1X10 
> to describe the data on the bus correctly as 10bpp Bayer, and the odd 
> packing is ignored. Or do we need new enums?

Just add new enums to media-bus-format.h. It should be clear from comments and/or
the naming of the enum what the exact format it, so you'll need to think about
that carefully. Otherwise it's no big deal to add new formats there.

Regards,

	Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux