Dear Patrick, Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 12:27 +0200 schrieb Patrick Boettcher: > On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 10:54 +0200 schrieb Patrick Boettcher: > >> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Paul Menzel wrote: > >>>> I'll post a request for testing soon. > >>> > >>> I am looking forward to it. > >> > >> Can you please try the drivers from here: > >> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/ > > > > I installed it as described in [1]. > > > > # clone > > make > > sudo make install > > sudo make unload > > # insert stick again > > > > [1] http://sidux.com/module-Wikula-history-tag-TerraTec.html […] > > Ok, I do not know how to test this objectively. Not knowing what how to > > do this, I just insert the console output of Kaffeine while scanning for > > channels. See the end of this message. Are those values showing the signal strength? > > In summary I would they I did not see any difference in quality between > > the two versions at a bad reception spot. I thought the signal bar > > showed values increased by 2?4 %, so a little bit better. > > Can be weather conditions.... I tested both version in a 30 minutes time frame. > The SNR could give a clue how far you are away from receiving, but it is > currently not implemented. > > I hate to request it, but can you try the windows driver with the device > without touching the antenna at that point. Like that we can exclude any Well, I cannot do it right now. But I can test it the Wednesday next week. I hope this is alright. Maybe some other people can test it sooner. (I therefore changed the subject.) Thanks, Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
