On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Valentin Longchamp wrote: > The sensor chips both are mt9t031 so they have the same i2c address (I have > looked at the datasheet, and I don't think this can be changed). So I cannot > use them both at the same time. Right, but I think, there are some i2c ICs, that allow for address translations. Don't remember what they are called, some multiplexers or some such. > Now you talk about the .power() callback, I could use it so that the > multiplexer is managed by it, using a similar mechanism as in mach-migor. If > this could allow me one different /dev/video nod for each camera (that of > course cannot be used at the same time), it would simplify a lot of things for > my users. I will give it a try (hoping that this also works at driver > registering ... we will see). Don't think it would work, at least not with the current stack. With the new stack video devices are registered at host-driver registration time, after i2c devices are registered. It wouldn't work with the old stack either. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
