On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: > It is my strong opinion that while autonegotiation is easy to use, it is > not a wise choice to make. Filling in a single struct with the bus > settings to use for each board-subdev combination (usually there is only > one) is simple, straight-forward and unambiguous. And I really don't see > why that should take much time at all. And I consider it a very good point > that the programmer is forced to think about this for a bit. Ok, my opinion is, that we should keep autonegotiation, but if you like, we can print a BIG-FAT-WARNING if both polarities are supported and no platform preference is set. I think, we've heard all opinions, unless someone would like to add something? Would it be fair to ask Mauro to make a decision? Or we can just count votes (which I would obviously prefer), but I'll accept Mauro's decision too. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
