On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 06:59:13PM +0200, ext Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Sunday 14 June 2009 18:23:41 Trent Piepho wrote: > > > > > similar V4L2_CID_MPEG_EMPHASIS control and others might well appear in the > > > > > future, so I think this name should be more specific to the FM_TX API. > > > > > > The cx88 driver could get support for setting the fm preemphasis via a > > > control. I added support via a module option, but a control would be > > > better. You're saying it shouldn't use this fm preemphasis control? > > > > Correct. This set the pre-emphasis when transmitting. For receiving you want > > a separate control. Although the enum should be made generic. So FM_TX can be > > removed from the enum. > > > > Why should we have one rx and one tx control for this? Because you can have > > both receivers and transmitters in one device and you want independent control > > of the two. > > Yes, agreed here. There is the possibility to have receiver and transmitter > both in the same device. So, I think it is better to have separated controls. Is both a receiver and transmitter in the same device different than having two receivers or two transmitters? In which case, since controls are not assigned to a specific input, how does one handle that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
