Re: XC5000 improvements: call for testers!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On May 6, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote:


If you do decide to narrow it down to a particular patch, please
switch over to the following tree first:

http://linuxtv.org/hg/~dheitmueller/xc5000-improvements-beta2

I re-exported the patch series and recreated the tree without all the
intermediate merges from the v4l-dvb tip.  As a result, it will be
much easier to bisect and determine which patch is causing the issue.


I finally had some time to do some more testing with the beta2 tree and I think most of the issues I had were user error. Not exactly sure what I did wrong before but I am not seeing the reception issues or any regressions on the digital side anymore. I think why I thought I was seeing QAM64 was because I was using the wrong tuner. With the beta2 tree my 950q is now adapter1, before it was always adapter2. That could be part of what I thought was the reception regression as well.

Thanks,
Britney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux