Hi again Mike, On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 11:25:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > > I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since > > I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to > > take into account the properties of the hardware device (i.e. only > > activate ir-kbd-i2c when we know it has a chance of working). > > Hmm, I thought that our latest discussions had (at least partly) > obsoleted your patches. Remember that we want to always instantiate > ir_video I2C devices even when ir-kbd-i2c can't driver them, otherwise > lirc won't be able to bind to the devices in question as soon as the > legacy binding model is gone. So the conditionals in your second patch > (which is all that makes it differ from mine) are no longer desirable. > > I'll work on lirc patches today or tomorrow, so that lirc doesn't break > when my patches hit mainline. Speaking of this: do you know all the I2C addresses that can host IR devices on pvrusb2 cards? I understand that the only address supported by ir-kbd-i2c is 0x18, but I also need to know the addresses supported by lirc_i2c and possibly lirc_zilog, if you happen to know this. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
