Hi Mike, On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:35:55 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely wrote: > I thought we were going to leave the pvrusb2 driver out of this since > I've already got a change ready that also includes additional logic to > take into account the properties of the hardware device (i.e. only > activate ir-kbd-i2c when we know it has a chance of working). Hmm, I thought that our latest discussions had (at least partly) obsoleted your patches. Remember that we want to always instantiate ir_video I2C devices even when ir-kbd-i2c can't driver them, otherwise lirc won't be able to bind to the devices in question as soon as the legacy binding model is gone. So the conditionals in your second patch (which is all that makes it differ from mine) are no longer desirable. I'll work on lirc patches today or tomorrow, so that lirc doesn't break when my patches hit mainline. Your first patch is still interesting but it is independent from my own patches, so it can be merged before or after, it doesn't matter. -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
