On Thursday 02 Apr 2009, Stian Skjelstad wrote: > > Stian Skjelstad <stian@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > usb 2-2: USB disconnect, address 47 > >> > >> gspca: urb status: -108 > >> gspca: urb status: -108 > >> gspca: disconnect complete > >> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000014 > >> IP: [<c02bc98e>] usb_set_interface+0x1e/0x1e0 > >> *pde = 00000000 > >> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT > > > > [snip] > > > >You did not tell which version of gspca you use. If it is the one of a > >kernel older than 2.6.30, you should update. Also, may this problem > >be reproduced? > > I'm using the built in one. I'm going to upgrade to 2.6.29 very soon. And > if problem still persists, I can build gspca outside the kernel instead. > 2.6.29 isn't good enough, you need the patch at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=d08e2ce0ebb38f2b66d875a09ebab3ed548354ee which only hit Linus' tree 3 days ago. I'm not sure whether it is appropriate for that patch to go to -stable. There are other patches that affect the relevant code but that one looks like it is a fix for a real bug that should apply cleanly to 2.6.29. I guess if you are able to confirm if it fixes 2.6.29 for you that would be a good indication it is appropriate for -stable. Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
