I like it. Can we add a section for tested architectures (i.e. x86, x86_64, arm, sparc, etc...). thanks, Paul On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Thomas Kaiser <v4l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I was thinking about updating my page [1] with the results I get with gspca > V2. But I think it would be better to have this info on the LinuxTV wiki. > Unfortunately, I did not find a page for gspca. So I thought I should start > one, but I don't think this is the right thing because there are other > drivers available for webcams. > > Why not start a "Webcam compatibly page" similar to my page [1]? > - a photo of the webcam > - USB ID > - capabilities of the cam > - the chipsets when known > - driver + version (+ kernel version), at the time tested > - application used for testing (version) > - links with some information to other interesting pages > - and some more you can think of > > What you guys think about it? > > > [1] http://www.kaiser-linux.li/index.php/Linux_and_Webcams > > Thomas > > PS: the only reference I found about gspca on the LinuxTV wiki: > http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Development:_Reverse_Engineering_USB_Webcams#gspca > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
