On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: > > be fairly easy, I can take care of it. The difficult part will be to > > handle the compatibility with kernels < 2.6.20 because delayed_work was > > introduced in 2.6.20. Probably "compatibility" here will simply mean > > that the bug I've hit will only be fixed for kernels >= 2.6.20. Which > > once again raises the question of whether we really want to keep > > supporting these old kernels. > > cancel_delayed_work_sync() was renamed from cancel_rearming_delayed_work() > in 2.6.23. A compat.h patch can handle that one. compat.h has code to handle it froma year ago. > In 2.6.22, cancel_delayed_work_sync(work) was created from > cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(wq, work). The kernel has a compat But cancel_rearming_delayed_work() already existed, the real change was that cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() was made obsolete by making cancel_rearming_delayed_work() not care what workqueue the work was in. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
