On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:47:10 +0100 Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > What is the status of the v4l2_driver.c in v4l2util? (formerly known as > libv4l2, see my pull request). > > While the original v4l2util just contained frequency tables (not much can go > wrong there), adding the v4l2_driver.c code in that library makes me > uncomfortable because: 1) it is undocumented, 2) it is unreviewed (and I > certainly do not agree with several of the choices made here!). > > I propose that v4l2_driver.c is moved to a new library (v4l2driver?) with a > README clarifying that this is experimental. > > I'm also willing to do a review of v4l2_driver.c for you. > > When a better and documented API is made, then it can be moved to v4l2util > and released officially. > > Documentation should probably go to the V4L2 spec in a separate chapter. Seems fine for me. Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
