[Adding libc-help@] Hi Helge, On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 10:46:26AM GMT, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Without further ado, the following was found: > > Issue: No "in succession" here on purpose? > > "When no I<key> is provided, use B<sethostent>(3), B<gethostent>(3), and " > "B<endhostent>(3) to enumerate the hosts database. When one or more I<key> " > "arguments are provided, pass each I<key> to B<gethostbyaddr>(3) or " > "B<gethostbyname2>(3), depending on whether a call to B<inet_pton>(3) " > "indicates that the I<key> is an IPv6 or IPv4 address or not, and display the " > "result." > > … and in many other paragraphs (I can provide you the full list). Last > time you said, that this is under review with glibc - are there any > results on this? They didn't respond. I've added libc-help@ now. For context for anyone from libc-help@: <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-man/ZUJaYgd8DCnFdm1V@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u> Cheers, Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
