Re: [PATCH] fsync.2: no writability requirements, must operate on directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * наб <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 2023-08-03 16:20:
> > Replace the FUD
> Do you mean to imply that this paragraph was added in bad faith?
> Because that's how it sounds.
I think it's definitely being adversarial to the reader, yes.
Hard to come up with a better newbie trap than vaguely saying
"on some (possibly popular) systems you need a property
 which fundamentally excludes half of the use-cases",
bonus points for making that property an
obscure-if-you-don't-know-about-it operation on directories,
documented once half-way through the fifty errors in open(2).

It would have cost approximately nothing to include HP-UX and AIX in the
text (especially since they're already in the commit message),
or to mention the directory syncing usecase explicitly here,
or up to 5 minutes to arrive at the bisection I got,
or write this in a way that isn't FUD,
so it must've been on purpose.

Best,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux