Re: [PATCH] fsync.2: no writability requirements, must operate on directories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 05:07:00PM +0100, Sam James wrote:
> наб <nabijaczleweli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Kill the FUD that says that some UNIXes require the fd to be writable:
> > they /must not/ and this confuses users:
> >   https://101010.pl/@eater@cijber.social/110824211348995583
> Must not, or need not be?
Mustn't require writability, since they needn't be writable.
Admittedly, this is probably sub-optimal phrasing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux