Hi Mickaël, On 4/17/23 23:13, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> Mickaël, do you have any opinions/preferences on this? > > Sorry, I missed this thread. I prefer your third solution because it is > explicit and relies on non-harcoded/magic values. I replied to the last > version of this patch but it might be a bit late now. No, it's not late. I already applied the patches, but new patches to fix stuff are always welcome ;) > > I'm not sure that defining a mask per ABI should be part of UAPI > (instead of dedicated libraries), but I'll think about that. Thanks. Cheers, Alex -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
