Hi Branden, On 2/25/23 02:19, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
Hi Alex, At 2023-02-25T02:10:22+0100, Alex Colomar wrote:On 2/23/23 09:48, Günther Noack wrote:On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 08:36:37AM +0100, Mickaël Salaün wrote:On 2023-02-21T21:50:22.000+01:00, Günther Noack wrote:+The availability of individual Landlock features is versioned through +ABI levels: +.TS +box; +ntb| ntb| lbx +nt| nt| lbx. +ABI Kernel Newly introduced access rights +_ _ _ +1 5.13 LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SOCK +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK +\^ \^ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM +_ _ _ +2 5.19 LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER +.TE +.PPA line break would be nice here.Added. (Used .sp 1 for that, as it is already used in the mount_namespaces.7, ip.7 and other man pages.)[reorganized]I see: The availability of individual Landlock features is versioned through ABI levels: ┌────┬────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ABI │ Kernel │ Newly introduced access rights │ ├────┼────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 1 │ 5.13 │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_WRITE_FILE │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_FILE │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_READ_DIR │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_DIR │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REMOVE_FILE │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_CHAR │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_DIR │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_REG │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SOCK │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_FIFO │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_BLOCK │ │ │ │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_SYM │ ├────┼────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 2 │ 5.19 │ LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER │ └────┴────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ To query the running kernel's Landlock ABI level, programs may pass the LANDLOCK_CREATE_RULESET_VERSION flag to landlock_cre‐ ate_ruleset(2).[reorganized]This sounds weird, but they are right that there seems to be a missing blank line.Yes, they are.Could you explain why it's happening?This is Savannah #49390. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49390 It is fixed in groff 1.23.0. Which, by the way, is at release candidate 3 now.
Ahh, I forgot that in my laptop I still have 1.22.4 :) Good to know that it's already fixed. Thanks!
Final release may be this weekend, depending on Bertrand's opinion of the changes I've made this week.[1]
Nice, we'll hopefully have it before I turn 30 (which BTW coincides with the deadline for having it in Bookworm, AFAIK :p)
I'd expect the .PP to separate paragraphs with a blank, right?It does, and it is, but you can't see it because groff 1.22.4 and earlier table did not move the drawing position below the bottom box border on nroff devices. The '.sp 1' workaround (which is synonymous with plain '.sp') can be removed when you feel groff 1.23.0 has spread sufficiently.
Since the bug is so minor, I'm in favor of removing it as soon as you release. A little bit of lack-of-blank-line inconvenience is not so bad.
Cheers, Alex
Regards, Branden [1] https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/groff.git/log/
-- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
