Re: %z and %Z in strftime man page require clarification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(given how complex a topic this is -- based on the discussion on the
tz mailing list -- you might want to send a specific suggestion in the
form of a patch...)

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 1:15 AM Almaz Mingaleev <mingaleev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Friendly ping.
>
>
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 09:16, Almaz Mingaleev <mingaleev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> > Current strftime specification in C language standard is not accurate.
> > It tells that tm_isdst is enough to find out time zone's offset. But
> > that's not true, for example Europe/Lisbon has changed [0] its
> > standard offset from 00:00 to 01:00 and back to 00:00, so an exact
> > date is needed to answer that.
> >
> > To get correct answer with the current glibc tm struct should either
> > come from localtime or there should be a mktime call prior to
> > strftime. You can find a repro example and discussion here [1]. Paul
> > Eggert has proposed a fix to C standard [2].
> >
> > Should man pages reflect that i.e. mention that there should be
> > localtime/mktime calls for %z and %Z?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Almaz
> >
> > P.S. I am resending the email. My previous attempt was bounced back as
> > it wasn't TEXT/PLAIN.
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/eggert/tz/blob/a249a0c64b2f87a24c7f1aab43056fb597c95b96/europe#L2400
> > [1] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2022-July/031668.html
> > [2] https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2022-July/031674.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux