On 12/30/20 1:52 PM, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) wrote: > > > On 12/30/20 10:38 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 21:53, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) >> <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Please, see a comment below. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> On 12/29/20 9:32 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>>> Hi Alex, Ganimedes, >>>> >>>> Again, in the subject line, s/ >>>> >>>> non-existing/nonexistent/ >>>> >>>> [...] >>>> >>>>> --- a/man2/getdents.2 >>>>> +++ b/man2/getdents.2 >>>>> @@ -211,13 +211,13 @@ SVr4. >>>>> Library support for >>>>> .BR getdents64 () >>>>> was added in glibc 2.30; >>>>> -there is no glibc wrapper for >>>>> -.BR getdents (). >>>>> -Calling >>>>> +Glibc does not provide a wrapper for >>>>> +.BR getdents (); >>>>> +call >>>> >>>> s/call/calling/ >>> >>> See below >>> >>>> >>>>> .BR getdents () >>>>> (or >>>>> .BR getdents64 () >>>>> -on earlier glibc versions) requires the use of >>>>> +on earlier glibc versions) using >>> >>> The new version is 'Call XXX using syscall(2).'. >> >> I need more context here please. What do you mean with "The new version"? > > Hi Michael, > > I mean after applying this patch. > > This patch changes ". Calling XXX requires the use of syscall(2)" > to "; call XXX using syscall(2)". > > "; calling XXX using syscall(2)" wouldn't make sense. Sorry -- got it now. I misread the patch. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
