On 12/30/20 10:38 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 at 21:53, Alejandro Colomar (man-pages) > <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Please, see a comment below. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Alex >> >> On 12/29/20 9:32 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >>> Hi Alex, Ganimedes, >>> >>> Again, in the subject line, s/ >>> >>> non-existing/nonexistent/ >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>> --- a/man2/getdents.2 >>>> +++ b/man2/getdents.2 >>>> @@ -211,13 +211,13 @@ SVr4. >>>> Library support for >>>> .BR getdents64 () >>>> was added in glibc 2.30; >>>> -there is no glibc wrapper for >>>> -.BR getdents (). >>>> -Calling >>>> +Glibc does not provide a wrapper for >>>> +.BR getdents (); >>>> +call >>> >>> s/call/calling/ >> >> See below >> >>> >>>> .BR getdents () >>>> (or >>>> .BR getdents64 () >>>> -on earlier glibc versions) requires the use of >>>> +on earlier glibc versions) using >> >> The new version is 'Call XXX using syscall(2).'. > > I need more context here please. What do you mean with "The new version"? Hi Michael, I mean after applying this patch. This patch changes ". Calling XXX requires the use of syscall(2)" to "; call XXX using syscall(2)". "; calling XXX using syscall(2)" wouldn't make sense. Thanks, Alex > > Thanks, > > Michael > >
