> * [.in 4] simply doesn't seem to work at all. > * [.RS 4] and [.RS +4n] seem to be equivalent. > * [.RS 4] is different (worse) than [.in +4n] > in some very specific scenario: > and [.in 4n] seems to indent to absolute column 4.
> * [.in 4] simply doesn't seem to work at all. > * [.RS 4] and [.RS +4n] seem to be equivalent. > * [.RS 4] is different (worse) than [.in +4n] > in some very specific scenario: > and [.in 4n] seems to indent to absolute column 4.
|