Re: .RS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Branden and Michael,

Okay, after some testing:

* [.in 4] simply doesn't seem to work at all.
* [.RS 4] and [.RS +4n] seem to be equivalent.
* [.RS 4] is different (worse) than [.in +4n]
          in some very specific scenario:

[[
.IP * 2
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit,
sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris
nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
.\""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
.IP		\" Indent is 2n after this
.in +4n		\" Indent is 6n after this
.EX
I am indented 6n from normal paragraphs.
.EE
.in		\" Return to normal
.\"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
.IP *
Augue interdum velit euismod in pellentesque.
Tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas.
Gravida arcu ac tortor dignissim convallis.
.\"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
.IP		\" Indent is 2n after this
.RS 4		\" Indent is _4n_ after this
.EX
I am indented 4n from normal paragraphs!!!
.EE
.RE		\" Return to normal
.\"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
]]

This happens in perf_event_open.2,
where [.in +4n] is used,
and when I changed it to [.RS/.RE] I saw this change in behavior.

Do you know why is that?

Thanks,

Alex



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Documentation]     [Netdev]     [Linux Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux