Hi Michael, On 2020-10-02 10:24, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
On 2020-10-01 19:32, Paul Eggert wrote: > For 'void *' you should also mention that one cannot use arithmetic on > void * pointers, so they're special in that way too. Good suggestion! > Also, you should > warn that because one can convert from any pointer type to void * and > then to any other pointer type, it's a deliberate hole in C's > type-checking. Also good. I'll talk about generic function parameters for this.
I think the patch as is now is complete enough to be added. So I won't rewrite it for now. Please review the patch as is, and I'll add more info to this type in the future. Thanks, Alex
