Hi Michael,
On 2020-10-01 17:34, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
Hello Alex,
On 10/1/20 5:06 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
Hello Michael,
This type is very special,
so I will probably have missed some details about it.
I do wonder if we actually need this in page at all, and given:
I think it should be.
I would also document 'void', even if it's a bit weird...
They are very useful, so why not document them?
Also, do you like the link name?
I really don't like it... I don't want to create files
whose names are globbing characters; that's a road to pain.
Yeah, me neither... :)
So, even if we did document this type in the page,
I don't think we can have a good link name. (I suppose we
could add it to the pagewithout having a link.)
But maybe we can have a link void.3.
Thanks,
Michael
Thanks,
Alex
